7 COMPARISON OF EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING AND SIROLIMUS-ELUTING CORONARY STENTS IN 1 YEAR CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW UP: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

Journal Title: Indian journal of applied basic medical sciences - Year 2016, Vol 18, Issue 26

Abstract

Background: Everolimus and sirolimus releasing new-generation coronary stents have been shown to reduce the risk of restenosis. However, efficacy and safety between the two types of stents in terms of end points is unclear. Similar outcomes have been reported in several recent randomized trials comparing everolimuseluting stent (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). Methods and results: In this study, a retrospective cohort study was done in the patients who underwent stent implantation using SES or EES. Comparison between SES and EES was done in patients who presented for follow up in our cardiology department over one year after their angioplasty. The study was carried out for evaluating non-inferiority of EES as compared to SES in terms of late ST and ISR requiring TRL. Out of the total 136 patients, 60 had SES implantation and 76 had EES implantation. All of these patients were subjected to coronary angiography after 1 year to look for patency of the stent. In-stent restenosis (outcome) was found in 3 patients in SES group and 4 patients in EES group respectively. All 7 patients who had ISR were suffering from diabetes and hypertension. Association between diabetes & ISR (Chi square= 5.488; p= 0.01; considering 95% CI) and hypertension & ISR (Chi square= 6.756; p= 0.00) is significant. While comparing the two stents: Everolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents with the outcome i.e., in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularisation (Chi square= 0.005; p= 0.94) with 95% CI, no significant difference between the two stents was found. Hence the null hypothesis, that there is no significant difference between use of Everolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents on clinical and angiographic follow up is accepted. Conclusions: At the end of 12 months, everolimus-eluting stent was non-inferior to and had similar results to SES implantation in terms of clinical and angiographic outcome in a population of patients who had minimalexclusion criteria.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Nirav Panchani, Dr Ankur Gupta

Keywords

Related Articles

14 New MEDICAL GADGETS

The Coupler device is implanted into the upper thigh where it is used to create a connection, a sort of fistula, between the iliac artery and iliac vein, allowing some blood to flow between the two. The cath lab procedur...

9 COMPARISION OF ANATOMICAL LANDMARK GUIDED TW0 DIFFERENT APPROACH FOR INTERNAL JUGULAR VENOUS CANULATION IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL.A RETROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY.

BACKGROUND:- There are various approaches for internal jugular venous(IJV) canulation. Anterior approach is used commonly but it is with incidence of complications like carotid artery puncture, haematoma and pneumothor...

5 Psychological aspects of Quality of life on strabismus

Objectives: To determine Quality Of Life using two preformed questionnaire ASQE and CVFQ in Strabismic subjects compared with Controls, and to assess QOL according to Gender and Angle of Deviation. Methods: This is a cr...

3 A STUDY TO ASSESS RELATION BETWEEN INTRA-OCULAR PRESSURE AND MYOPIA IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS

Back ground and Objective Myopia is one of the commonest ocular disorders. Some studies reported that the mean IOP value of myopes was significantly higher than that of emmetropes. So in this study we aimed to evaluate t...

10 STUDY OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF PRETERM DELIVERIES

Objective: To study the epidemiological profile of preterm deliveries Study Design :Retrospective Observational Study Duration of Study :1 year : June 2014 to May 2015 Patient and Methods :Data was collected from the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP249962
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Nirav Panchani, Dr Ankur Gupta (2016). 7 COMPARISON OF EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING AND SIROLIMUS-ELUTING CORONARY STENTS IN 1 YEAR CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW UP: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.. Indian journal of applied basic medical sciences, 18(26), 846-849. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-249962