A comparative study of arthroscopic reconstruction of acl using bone patellar tendon bone graft and quadrupled hamstring tendon graft

Abstract

Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using either autologous Bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) graft or Quadrupled hamstring tendon graft has equal number of proponents worldwide. The aim of this study is to find out the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure in terms of outcome at 3 year of post-operative follow-up. Methods In this study 30 patients underwent ACLR of which 15 patients each were allocated randomly to undergo either BPTB or Quadrupled hamstring graft. Subjective as well as objective outcome measures such as analog scales, international knee documentation committee (IKDC) form, Tegners scale, stress radiographs and Lysholm scores were used to document pre-operative and postoperative patient characteristics related to ACL deficiency and knee joint, were used in the study. Statistical analysis was used to compare preoperative status and postoperative outcome for all the variables measured in the study. Outcome was statistically analysed using PSPP software. Results ACLR using either BPTB or hamstring graft yielded statistically significant improvement (p values 0.001 and 0.002 respectively) when compared to preoperative IKDC subjective scores. At 3 year postoperative follow-up, subjective & objective IKDC scores, Tegner’s scale, Lysholm scores and stress radiographs showed no significant difference between the two groups. PTB group had graft donor site related complaints including anterior knee pain in 3 patients and numbness lateral to patella in 1 patient. Conclusion ACLR using either graft results in improved knee function in terms of stability and pain at 3 year follow-up. This study could not demonstrate clear advantage of either graft over the other in terms of functional outcome. Overall hamstring graft has marginal advantage with less graft site morbidity when compared to BPTB graft.

Authors and Affiliations

Kasukurthi Raja Shekhar, Kopuri Ravi Kiran, G Jagadesh

Keywords

Related Articles

Ejaculation Preserving Trans Urethral Resection Of Prostate (epTURP): An Initial Study

A short term prospective study was conducted on 10 patients (age range 55-65 years and sexually active) undergoing the ejaculation preserving Trans Urethral Resection of Prostate (epTURP). They were evaluated for preserv...

Evaluation Of Clinical Results And Complications Of Internal Fixation Of Proximal Humeral Fractures With The Proximal Humerus Locking Plate

Introduction:A proximal humeral fracture is a common injury to the shoulder and account for approximately 5% of all fractures and 26% of all humeral fractures. Despite recent advancement in management of proximal hume...

Functional Outcome Of Open Reduction And Internal Fixation Of Segmental (BIFOCAL) Forearm Fractures

Background- Segmental fractures of the forearm bones are rare and occasionally seen by trauma surgeons. These are often seen in high velocity injuries, and hence are accompanied by high degree of comminution and compound...

Evaluation Of Ohmann Score And Correlation With Ultrasound For Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis

Background:Acute appendicitis is a common surgical condition that requires prompt diagnosis. However a decision to operate based on clinical suspicion alone can lead to removal of normal appendix in 15 -30% cases. Bes...

Functional Outcome Of Displaced Intra-Articular Fractures Of The Calcaneus Treated With Minimally Invasive Fixation: A Retrospective Study

Background: Management of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus remains a challenge despite recent advances in diagnostic and operative techniques. Traditional open reduction and internal fixation is assoc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP394938
  • DOI -
  • Views 122
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kasukurthi Raja Shekhar, Kopuri Ravi Kiran, G Jagadesh (2017). A comparative study of arthroscopic reconstruction of acl using bone patellar tendon bone graft and quadrupled hamstring tendon graft. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 3(2), 730-736. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-394938