A comparative study of Ayatollah Motahhari’s views on Jihad and Rawls’ views on Humanitarian Wars

Journal Title: The Journal of Human Rights - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 1

Abstract

Since there appears to be a relationship between Ayatollah Mutahhari’s ‘Jihad’ theory and John Rawls’s Humanitarian War theory, and between their shared social concerns, this study aims at investigating whether the two theories are similar or different in terms of legitimacy of war and the use of force. It seems that humanitarian jihad and liberal humanitarian intervention have a similar genesis, the difference being that the former is prescribed on theological foundations and the latter is founded on ethical liberalism, though the two have similar claims. Can this apparently unprofessed resemblance in permissibility of jihad in Jihad theory of Ayatollah Motahhari – as a Muslim jurist and philosopher - and the justification of war to confront violation of human rights in “The Law of Peoples” as a complement to theory of justice of Rawls – as a Kantian liberal philosopher be considered a significant relationship? چکیده نسبتی ناخواسته میان نظریه جهاد شهید مرتضی مطهری و جان رالز و مشابهت برخی دغدغه‌های اجتماعی آن‌ها بهانه‌ای است برای کنجکاوی در امکان تشابه یا افتراق نظریه این دو در باب مشروعیت جنگ و توسل ابتدایی به زور. در این بررسی به نظر می‌رسد جهاد بشردوستانه آن گونه که از نامش پیداست سنخیتی با مداخله بشردوستانه دارد؛ با این تفاوت که اولی از منظری ایدئولوژیک و الهی تجویز می‌شود و دومی از منظر لیبرالیسم اخلاقی؛ گر چه هر دو تقریباً مدعای یکسانی دارند. آیا این تشابه علی الظاهر ناخودآگاه در میان موارد تجویز جهاد در نظریه جهاد شهید مطهری به عنوان یک فقیه فلسفه‌گرای مسلمان و توجیه جنگ برای مقابله با نقض حقوق بشر در «قانون مردمان» به عنوان مکمل نظریه عدالت جان رالز، به عنوان یک فیلسوف لیبرال کانت‌گرا نقطه‌ای مشترک و پیوندی وثیق محسوب می‌شود؟

Authors and Affiliations

Amir Maghami

Keywords

Related Articles

Justifying Reasons for Giving Employment Priorities to Isargaran and Veterans in Iranian and American Law

Equality is one of the principles and fundamental rights of human being. There has been lots of talk about equality and justice, but the legal aspect of this principle is still under dispute. Human beings are born equal,...

Identity, Language, and Rights: A Critical Theory Perspective

This paper is an attempt to fill the gap in the literature by presenting a language policy formulated according to the idea of constitutional patriotism that overcomes the charge of ineffectiveness. I will argue that the...

Conceptual Model of Elements and Dimensions of Corporal Punishment According to Internal and External Researches

Corporal punishment is using physical force to discipline or correct a child`s behavior so that they experience pain without any harm. Corporal punishment occurs mainly at home or at school. The present study investigate...

Equality: the Basis of Rule of Law and Peace

Legal concepts are linked together like a chain and so, obviously in macro analysis, each of them will not be independent of other concepts. Rule of Law, is one of the modern theories of public law and one of its foundat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP305180
  • DOI -
  • Views 144
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Amir Maghami (2012). A comparative study of Ayatollah Motahhari’s views on Jihad and Rawls’ views on Humanitarian Wars. The Journal of Human Rights, 7(1), 3-24. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-305180