A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE LOWERING EFFECT OF 2% DORZOLAMIDE AND 0.5% TIMOLOL IN POAG

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 42

Abstract

BACKGROUND Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy in which there is characteristic structural damage to the optic nerve head associated with widespread progressive ganglion cell death, nerve fibre loss and typical visual field defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS The patients were selected from the Outpatient Department of Ophthalmology, Nalanda Medical College, Patna. A total of 100 cases of primary open-angle glaucoma were selected from those attending the outpatient department. They were divided into various groups and comparative study was done. Group 1- IOP between 20-30 mmHg. Group2- IOP above 30 mmHg. Group 1 had total 60 patients whereas group 2 had total 40 patients. Each group were further divided into subgroups A and B. Subgroup A included those on timolol maleate (0.5%), whereas subgroup B those on dorzolamide hydrochloride (2%). Patients who had intraocular surgery and those on systemic beta blockers were excluded from this study. Patients were instructed not to administer their eye drops on the morning of the checkup visits in order to measure drug efficacy 12 hours after previous evening dose. RESULTS Group 1- There was a mean reduction of 6.2 ± 1.85 (22.94%) and 5.55 ± 1.68 (21.38%) mm of Hg in right and left eye respectively with timolol, whereas dorzolamide group showed a reduction of 3.91 ± 1.69 (14.04%) respectively in right and left eye. Group 2- There was a mean reduction of 4.72 ± 2.97 (15.73%) and 5.3s7 ± 1.24 (16.26%) in right and left eye respectively with timolol, whereas dorzolamide group showed a reduction of 4.30 ± 1.41 (12.90%) and 4.12 ± 2.08 mmHg (12.56%) in right and left eye, respectively. CONCLUSION Timolol maleate (0.5%) has an edge over dorzolamide hydrochloride (2%) as far as IOP lowering effect is concerned.

Authors and Affiliations

Navin Chandra, Suresh Kumar Sinha

Keywords

Related Articles

FNCC VS. FNAC TECHNIQUES IN CASE OF THYROID NODULE - A COMPARATIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND FNCC (Fine Needle Capillary Cytology) and FNAC (Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology) are two fine established techniques, for cytodiagnosis in case of a thyroid nodule, which is a rich vascular organ. Comparative...

A COMPARITIVE EVALUATION OF 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE AND 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY

BACKGROUND Brachial plexus blockade is considered as cornerstone of regional anaesthesia practice. Ropivacaine is a new amide, long acting, pure S (-) enantiomer and local anaesthetic. This study was done to compare clon...

EFFICACY OF DIRECTLY ACTING ANTIVIRAL DRUGS FOR HCV IN REAL LIFE: EXPERIENCE FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE OF NORTH INDIA

BACKGROUND Since its discovery, treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) has undergone extensive changes. Antiviral treatments and sustained virological responses (SVR) have also improved from the early interferon monotherap...

TAKOTSUBO CARDIOMYOPATHY IN A CASE OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PATIENT- A CASE REPORT

PRESENTATION OF THE CASE A 53-year-old male presented to a secondary care hospital with pain abdomen for the past 2 months. He was diagnosed to have biliary colic and was posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy....

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NASAL ENDOSCOPIC CAUTERIZATION AS FIRST LINE MANAGEMENT FOR EPISTAXIS- A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND Epistaxis is the most common emergency in otorhinolaryngology. The usual treatment in most cases of anterior epistaxis and almost all cases of posterior epistaxis is nasal packing followed by either cauterizat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP219916
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2017/512
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Navin Chandra, Suresh Kumar Sinha (2017). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE LOWERING EFFECT OF 2% DORZOLAMIDE AND 0.5% TIMOLOL IN POAG. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 4(42), 2585-2587. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-219916