A comparison between epidural Butorphanol and Tramadol for postoperative analgesia, sedation and side effects using CSEA technique for surgeries below the level of umbilicus

Journal Title: International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research - Year 2016, Vol 7, Issue 11

Abstract

Background and Aims: Epidural analgesia using low doses of local anesthetic agent with or without adjuvants like opioids is a popular, simple, effective and economical way of providing postoperative analgesia. We proposed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of epidural opioids, Butorphanol and Tramadol using Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia (CSEA) technique for surgeries below the level of umbilicus for postoperative analgesia, sedation and side effects. Methods: In this prospective, double blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, 60 patients aged 18 to 60 years, ASA grade 1 or 2 posted for planned elective surgery below the level of umbilicus were selected. Study Design: The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive postoperatively either 1 mg of inj. Butorphanol (dissolved in 10 ml of normal saline) (Group B) or 50 mg of inj. Tramadol (dissolved in 10 ml of normal saline) (Group T) epidurally as a bolus dose when the VAS score for pain was more than 4 after the conclusion of surgical procedure as the effect of spinal anaesthesia started wearing off. Statistics and Results: The mean duration of analgesia with tramadol (group T) 6.481 ( 0.86842) hrs. was significantly higher than with butorphanol (group B) i.e., 5.352 (0.33258) hrs with a p value of 0.0001. Pain scores were also significantly lower statistically in group B as compared to group T. Sedation scores were significantly higher in group B than group T, which was statistically highly significant (p= 0.0001). Conclusion: Both epidural, butorphanol and tramadol provided good postoperative analgesia. The duration of analgesia was longer with tramadol, quality of analgesia was better with butorphanol, sedation more with butorphanol as compared to tramadol and other side effects were comparable.

Authors and Affiliations

Preeti More, Charchill Wagh, Vandana Laheri

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of vitamin D3 level in patients with diabetes mellitus

Introduction: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is primarily measured to identify glycemic control in diabetic patients. According to The American Diabetes Association (ADA), and World Health Organization (WHO), HbA1c concentr...

Hypothyroidism and possible association with Metabolic Syndrome

Background: Thyroid dysfunctions are the most common forms of endocrine disorder in our country, Thyroid hormones perform a wide array of metabolic functions including regulation of lipids, carbohydrates, protein and ele...

A Clinical Study of Oral Malignancies in Rural Set Up

Aim and Objectives: Aim of the present research was to study the epidemiologic profile, risk factors, different surgical approaches, post operative complications and surgical outcome of oral cancer in rural set up. Meth...

Porta Hepatis in Normal Liver

Background: Hepatic surgery requires comprehensive knowledge of structures passing through porta hepatis. This fact prompted us to undertake the study of porta hepatis (PH). Our aim was to find out the dimensions, shape...

A comparison between epidural Butorphanol and Tramadol for postoperative analgesia, sedation and side effects using CSEA technique for surgeries below the level of umbilicus

Background and Aims: Epidural analgesia using low doses of local anesthetic agent with or without adjuvants like opioids is a popular, simple, effective and economical way of providing postoperative analgesia. We propose...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP368020
  • DOI 10.7439/ijbar.v7i11.3730
  • Views 120
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Preeti More, Charchill Wagh, Vandana Laheri (2016). A comparison between epidural Butorphanol and Tramadol for postoperative analgesia, sedation and side effects using CSEA technique for surgeries below the level of umbilicus. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 7(11), 537-542. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-368020