A COMPARITIVE EVALUATION OF 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE AND 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND Brachial plexus blockade is considered as cornerstone of regional anaesthesia practice. Ropivacaine is a new amide, long acting, pure S (-) enantiomer and local anaesthetic. This study was done to compare clonidine and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.75% ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective randomised double-blind study was done in 80 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade I and II undergoing elective upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular block. Patients were randomised into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=40) received 30 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine with clonidine 1 mcg/kg and group 2 (n=40) received 30 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg. Onset and recovery time of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia and quality of block, haemodynamic variables and level of sedation were studied in two groups. RESULTS Sensory and motor block onset times were shorter in group 2 (onset of sensory block was 4.9 ± 1.08 minutes and onset of motor block was 8.9 ± 1.41 minutes) than in group 1 (onset of sensory block was 10.7 ± 4.05 minutes and onset of motor block took 12.1 ± 4.11 minutes) (p value <0.0001). Sensory and motor block durations and duration of analgesia were longer in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.0001). Blood pressure and heart rate were lower in group 2 as compared to group 1 (p value <0.0001). The number of patients achieving grade 4 quality of block was higher in group 2 as compared to group 1. CONCLUSION Dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) hastens the onset of sensory and motor block, prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block, enhances the quality of block and sedation and also prolongs duration of analgesia as compared with clonidine (1 mcg/kg) when used as an adjuvant to 0.75% ropivacaine in supraclavicular block.

Authors and Affiliations

Vallem Balasubramanyam, Sai Suraj K. N, Talisetti Jamuna

Keywords

Related Articles

RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANOMALIES

Detailed discussions of the CVJ are conspicuously absent in many standard textbooks and chapters addressing the skull or cervical spine, since it lies in between these regions. CVJ anomalies are common in India subcontin...

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL VERSUS MISOPROSTOL ALONE IN MID TRIMESTER TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY

BACKGROUND Termination of pregnancy in second trimester continues to be a challenge in developing countries especially in rural areas. There is an exponential rise in complications of abortion along with advancing gestat...

EVALUATION OF HEPATOBILIARY DISEASES USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY FEATURES

BACKGROUND Hepatobiliary system diseases are a common pathology encountered in clinical practice. Ultrasound, Computed Tomography (CT), and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Magnetic Resonance Cho...

ADAMS LOBE: A CASE REPORT

Morphological variations when present in fissures and lobes of lung are of great importance to anatomists as well as cardiothoracic surgeons. The present case reports an azygos lobe in the apex of right lung in a 40 year...

CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF CUTANEOUS METASTASES- A SEVEN-YEAR STUDY

BACKGROUND Cutaneous metastases are rare and occur in only 0.6%-10.4% of all malignancies.1,2 Though they are more often seen in the advanced stage of cancer, it may be the first sign of malignancy and can lead to diagno...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP448582
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2018/23
  • Views 79
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vallem Balasubramanyam, Sai Suraj K. N, Talisetti Jamuna (2018). A COMPARITIVE EVALUATION OF 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE AND 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 5(2), 101-106. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-448582