A Deliberation on Punishment for Pederasty: Legal-Judicial Analysis of Article 110 of Iranian Civil Law

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2012, Vol 44, Issue 88

Abstract

Despite the challenges noticed in the meaning and concept of pederasty (lawāṭ), different viewpoints have always existed among the jurists concerning the punishment of the pederast, to the extent that some jurists have decreed death penalty equally for both the married and unmarried pederast. In contrast, some others have reconciled among the related traditions in this respect and considered the same punishment for pederasty as the one for adultery and have distinguished between the married and the unmarried pederast. Quoting various opinions as well as analyzing the evidences derived from traditions concerning the punishment of the pederast, the present article considers as constrainable the absoluteness of the traditions referred to by the jurists who believe in the equal punishment for the married and unmarried pederast and maintains that the exigency of the reconciliation among the traditions is that the pederast, in case of being married, is sentenced to death and if unmarried is sentenced to lashes. Of course, as for pederasty in case of non-penetration (ghayr īqāb), several views are recognizable in Imāmiya jurisprudence, as the generally accepted view has considered lashes and some jurists like Shaykh Ṭūsī in Al-Nihāya have decreed lapidation for the married man and lashes for the unmarried man. The Islamic penal law, on the basis of some traditions, has simply considered death penalty as the punishment for pederasty in case of penetration. Examining the objections made against the lawmaker’s definition of pederasty, the present research analyzes article 110 of Iranian Civil Law and tries to criticize the lawmaker’s legislative function besides analyzing the lawmaker’s basis in establishing punishment for pederasty

Authors and Affiliations

Hamid MasjidsarāI

Keywords

Related Articles

The General Rules Governing the Contracts for the Utilization of Literary and Artistic Rights in Iran through Comparative Study in French and Egyptian Law

Law Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad The importance of the exploitation contracts protecting the literary and artistic rights has, in some legal systems like France, resulted in the devising of general and comm...

Legal Sanction for Non-observance of Expediency in Power of Attorney

Power of attorney (PA) contract is among the specified contracts that are widely used in society and people’s legal relations, because on one hand, people are not compelled to directly vindicate their rights and, on the...

Analysis of the Legal Decree of Allowance and Determination

If, in special circumstances, a decree that had already not been permissible becomes permissible due to facilitation for the religiously accountable (mukallif), that legal decree is called allowance (rukhṣat), such as th...

Revisiting the authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins)

Non-authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins) is a topic frequently raised in the Usulis’ contemporary literature. In this paper, the authority of “alidjma almadraki” has been studied through revisiting...

The nature of signed ordinances

Signed ordinances are a major part of religious ordinances having existed as normative before the institution of divine canonization and having been approved without any or with slight modification by the legislator and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP183267
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.12920
  • Views 140
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hamid MasjidsarāI (2012). A Deliberation on Punishment for Pederasty: Legal-Judicial Analysis of Article 110 of Iranian Civil Law. فقه و اصول, 44(88), 101-124. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-183267