A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2006, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper proposes a revised version of the original Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale developed by Weber, Blais, and Betz (2002) that is shorter and applicable to a {broader range of ages, cultures, and educational levels}. It also provides a French translation of the revised scale. Using multilevel modeling, we investigated the risk-return relationship between apparent risk taking and risk perception in 5 risk domains. The results replicate previously noted differences in reported degree of risk taking and risk perception at the mean level of analysis. The multilevel modeling shows, more interestingly, that within-participants variation in risk taking across the 5 content domains of the scale was about 7 times as large as between-participants variation. We discuss the implications of our findings in terms of the person-situation debate related to risk attitude as a stable trait.
Authors and Affiliations
Ann-Renée Blais and Elke U. Weber
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677547
- DOI -
- Views 293
- Downloads 0
Risk communication with pictographs: The role of numeracy and graph processing
We conducted three studies to investigate how well pictographs communicate medical screening information to persons with higher and lower numeracy skills. In Study 1, we conducted a 2 (probability level: higher vs. lower...
Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y., (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209, explored how psychological distance influences moral judgment and found tha...
Weighted Brier score decompositions for topically heterogenous forecasting tournaments
Brier score decompositions, including those attributed to Murphy and to Yates, provide popular metrics for estimating forecast performance attributes like calibration and discrimination. However, the decompositions are g...
Justifying the judgment process affects neither judgment accuracy, nor strategy use
Decision quality is often evaluated based on whether decision makers can adequately explain the decision process. Accountability often improves judgment quality because decision makers weigh and integrate information mor...
Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in goal penalty shootouts
Previous research has reported that the gambler’s fallacy could be detected in goalkeepers’ behavior during penalty shootouts. Following repeated kicks in the same direction, goalkeepers were more likely to dive in the o...