A Juridical-Legal Inquiry into ‘Aḍl in the Marriage of the Grown-up Virgin
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2011, Vol 43, Issue 87
Abstract
To prevent the consequences of inexperience and prevalence of fervor resulting from emotions and sentiments in a young girl who is unfamiliar with marital affairs, the legislator has deemed as necessary the permission [for marriage] by the girl’s father as the most compassionate person in recognition of her interests. However, this is a controversial issue in jurisprudence. The father and paternal grandfather have no authority over the marriage of the grown-up female who is divorced or non-virgin (thayyiba); but there are some views in case she is a grown-up virgin. All the jurists who regard the guardian (walī)’s permission in marriage of the virgin girl as valid go on to say that the guardian’s permission is valid only if the guardian does not refrain from giving permission without an excused reason. However, if the guardian refuses to give permission despite the existence of a competent suitor and the girl’s willingness, in that case the validity of his permission is voided. Nevertheless, if the guardian prohibits the girl from getting married to someone incompatible or equal to her (in marriage), this prohibition is called ‘aḍl. In this paper, following the conceptology of the terms and through a comparative study of the Imāmī and Sunni schools, we will examine the term ‘aḍl as the most important instance of the lapse of authority (wilāya) of the guardian in the marriage of a grown-up virgin. In conclusion, we will critically review the viewpoint of the Iranian law in this respect.
Authors and Affiliations
Alī Akbar ĪZadīFard, ḤUsayn KāViyāNī
Status of Human Dignity in the Process of Inferring Rulings
With the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, human dignity as an important foundation for explication and formulation of human rights seriously found its way into the legal texts, to the extent...
A comparative study of the similarities and differences between ‘assisting’ and ‘causing’ within two rules: the prohibition of ‘assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’
Assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’ are two important jurisprudential rules with crucial implications. ‘Assisting’ and ‘causing’ as derived from those rules have a lot in common. At the same time, what their difference...
Replacement of certitude as to subject by authorized conjectural proof (amara)
Although Mohaghegh Khorasani has raised the impossibility of replacement of certitude as to subject by authorized conjectural proof (amara) due to the impediment of conjunction in consideration; Sheikh Ansari, while reje...
A Jurisprudential Research in Material Value and Ownership of News in Mass Media and the Rights Resulting from it
Information dissemination throughout the society is carried out by a phenomenon called news. This phenomenon is in relation to various social institutions as well as different aspects of people’s lives. In the present ar...
Proportion of Ordinance and Subject: Functions and Mechanism of Recognition in the Jurists’ Expression
One of the requisites for proper understanding of the legal statutes (nuṣūṣ) is that the legislator and the jurist, along with other wise people in various scenes of life, should enjoy collective wisdom and, besides havi...