A randomized comparative study on brachial plexus block using nerve stimulator: infraclavicular - coracoid approach vs supraclavicular approach

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Pain relief with peripheral nerve block (PNB) is devoid of side effects such as somnolence, nausea, vomiting, hemodynamic instability and voiding difficulties inherent to general and central neuraxial anesthesia. Aim: To compare the clinical efficacy of infraclavicular and supraclavicular approach of brachial plexus block by using peripheral nerve stimulator. Materials & Methods: Sixty patients of ASA grade I and II undergoing upper limb surgeries were randomly assigned into two groups, Group I and Group S group I: received infraclavicular block by coracoid approach, group S: received Supraclavicular block. Surgeries below the level of elbow were selected for this study. Parameters observed were – block performance time, sensory and motor blockade, and its quality, duration of post op analgesia, and block related complications. Results: Time to perform block, onset of both motor and sensory blockade, duration of post op analgesia were not different in group I and Group S. Success rate of blocking four nerves to the elbow (musculocutaneous, ulnar, radial, median,) was comparable between the groups. The incidence of complications in the form of vascular puncture was not significant in both group I and Group S. Conclusion: From our study it is inferred that nerve locator guided Infraclavicular block of brachial plexus by coracoid approach is at least as rapidly executed as nerve locator guided Supraclavicular approach and produces a similar degree of surgical anaesthesia with similar complication rates.

Authors and Affiliations

A. Niranjan Kumar, NV. Madhava Krishna, VJ. Karthik, S. Mahalakshmi

Keywords

Related Articles

A prospective randomized comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries

Introduction and Aims ultrasound had revolutionized the nerve block by increasing the reliability with less complications This study evaluates the block characteristics and efficacy between perivascular and perineural ul...

A randomized double blind comparative study on onset time and intubating conditions achieved with succinylcholine 1.5mg/kg and Rocuronium 0.6mg/kg & 0.9mg/kg IV

Introduction: A perfect setting for tracheal intubation include a rapid onset, and short duration of action. These requirements are best met by succinylcholine, an ultrashort acting depolarizing muscle relaxant. However...

Study of intravenous tramadol versus rectal tramadol for postoperative analgesia after appendectomy

Introduction: Tramadol is atypical opioid having central as well as peripheral analgesic action. It acts on opioid receptors as well as having effect on neuronal reuptake of nor epinephrine and serotonin. In this study,...

Prospective randomized controlled study to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine and pethidine on patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries

Introduction Spine surgeries especially spine fusion surgeries cause severe postoperative pain hampering convalescence This is a randomized double blind controlled study comparing the analgesic efficacy of postoperative...

Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterization using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach

Aims and Objectives: Supraclavicular approach (SC) is less popular route of subclavian vein catheterization than infraclavicular approach (IC). The aim of the study was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of subc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP311051
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0003
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. Niranjan Kumar, NV. Madhava Krishna, VJ. Karthik, S. Mahalakshmi (2017). A randomized comparative study on brachial plexus block using nerve stimulator: infraclavicular - coracoid approach vs supraclavicular approach. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 4(1), 8-12. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-311051