A Research on the Concept and Reliability of Fixed Way of Religionists (Irtikāz al-Mutisharri‘a) as Explained by Shī‘a Jurists’
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2014, Vol 46, Issue 97
Abstract
Sīra is of a sublime status in Shī‘a jurisprudence and has been used as the most important reason in endorsed rulings of Islam. The Shī‘a jurists have used it as one of their evidences for inference of rulings to the extent that they have regarded it as superior to consensus (ijmā‘) and viewed the authority of sīra as a cause for endorsement or non-hindrance by the Infallibles (A.S.). In the course of the history of inference, a new term has been developed, which in line with sīra was employed as a proof for inference of rulings and the jurists called it fixed way of religionists or irtikāz al-mutisharri‘a. It is the proof and establishment of a concept in the religionists’ mind that cannot be easily given up and sometimes it results in external conduct and behavior and yet at other times it remains to be subjective. That the jurists have relied on irtikāz in some rulings indicates that in their view irtikāz is authoritative. Conceptual irtikāz is separate from sīra and it behooves to be dealt with under another heading than sīra, even though, like sīra, it is regarded as rational (lubbī) circumstantial evidence and in many instances it is the original resource for the evidences. In this research, after giving a definition of sīra and irtikāz al-mutisharri‘a and proving the conditions for their authority, it is tried to compare these two terms and to clarify their similarities and differences, and then to point out the instances that are regarded as origins for irtikāz.
Authors and Affiliations
AbulfaḍL ‘AlīShāHī Qal‘AjūQī
The Role of Referring Pronoun to some Common Individuals
Sometimes there comes a pronoun after a common [individual], which has apparently been used as the object of a legal decision (ḥukm), and by means of external evidence, the certainty is achieved that this pronoun refers...
A Critique on the Theory of the Necessity of the Oneness of Consort (Faḥl)
Among the causes for the prohibition of marriage is fosterage, which is one of the most important issues of concern. There is consensus among the jurists of all the Islamic schools in that fosterage is one of the causes...
A Jurisprudential-Exegetical Exploration into the Lawfulness of Sacrifice in Revealed Scriptures in Light of Āya 5 of Sūrat al-Mā’ida
The lawfulness of dhabīḥa (sacrifice) in Revealed Scriptures is implied from āya 5 of Sūrat al-Mā’ida, and the reason for it, besides the contexts and appreciativeness of the ruling for lawfulness, is that the word ṭa‘ām...
A Study of Defining Law for the Activities of an Unsound Network Marketing System
Network marketing is a sale distribution method based on profiting plans and the unsound network marketing is its deviated form. In this system, recruiting members suffices and according to the pyramidal plans that the c...
The Impact of Obligation to Assignment of Ownership (Tamlīk) in Imāmī Jurisprudence and Iranian Law
In ordinary cases, the object of transaction in such contracts as sale (bay‘) and lease (ijāra) has financcial value like property (‘ayn) or profit, or physical action. However, whether obligation to performing an action...