A Review of Advance Directives

Journal Title: The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health (JMLPH) - Year 2024, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

The use of an advance directive, when drafted in accordance with the MCA, allows a person the right to refuse specified treatment at a later stage of their life, should they become incapacitated. This means that they, rather than others, can determine what would be in their own best interest. However, even when a person has made an advance directive, their express wishes can be overruled by the court if they have acted in such a way, or there has been a change in circumstances, that is inconsistent with their advance directive. That is, in the event of clear inconsistencies with an advance directive, the court will rule in favour of the preservation of life. Thus, in certain circumstances, it may be justifiable for an advance directive not to be binding. This review aims to evaluate the practices around advance healthcare directives in England and Wales. In particular, it focuses on advance directives for refusal of life-sustaining treatment, and how the courts interpret Section 25(2) (c) MCA in determining when an advance directive is no longer valid or applicable to the specified treatment as a result of inconsistencies subsequent to the document’s drafting. Furthermore, it contends that a mandatory capacity assessment prior to drafting an advance directive could eliminate contentious issues at a later stage.

Authors and Affiliations

Lisa Kachina Poku

Keywords

Related Articles

Impact of Inter-facility Critical Care Transport System in Saudi Arabia: Acute Aortic Dissection Case Report

The critical care transport service (CCT) is an important factor in the successful delivery of high-quality services by any healthcare system or programme. It is conducted by well-trained, qualified paramedics, nurses an...

Patient Satisfaction with the Emergency Department Experience in the Era of COVID-19: A National Survey

Background Patient satisfaction with an ED visit is often overlooked during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and requires further examination. Aim We aim to investigate, on a national scale, patients’ satisfaction during t...

Prehospital Thoracotomy: A Commentary

Traumatic cardiac arrest is a critical condition with potentially rectifiable causes, such as airway obstruction, tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, or exsanguinating bleeding. The evolution of advanced prehospital...

Vendor Attraction to Improve the PTM System: A Commentary

Advancement in healthcare technology has shaped modern healthcare delivery. Vendors that supply advanced technology are profit-driven, but at the same time their profit is contingent upon awareness of, and acceptability...

The Prevalence of COVID-19 in Jizan Region-Saudi Arabia: A Demographic Analysis

BACKGROUND The unrelenting pandemic of the SARS CoV2 (COVID-19) pleads for re-examining predictors of infection and containment measures, once again. AIMS The researchers aim to investigate the prevalence of COVID-19 in...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP732310
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.52609/jmlph.v4i2.116
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lisa Kachina Poku (2024). A Review of Advance Directives. The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health (JMLPH), 4(2), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-732310