A Study to Compare the Effect of Intrathecal Midazolam and Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Infra-umbilical Surgeries
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 2
Abstract
Context: Since spinal anaesthesia provides analgesia for short time with local anaesthetics, many intrathecal adjuvants to local anaesthetic drugs have been addressed to augment the clinical efficiency and duration of anaesthesia intra & post operatively. Aims: To compare the efficacy of midazolam and nalbuphine as adjuvants in spinal anaesthesia in infra umbilical surgeries. Material and method: This study was conducted on 50 patients aged 18 to 55 years ASA I and II, randomly divided in 2 groups by chit method undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Group BM received 0.5% bupivacaine heavy 3 ml, 2 mg preservative free midazolam made 3.5 ml with 0.9% normal saline and Group BN received 0.5% bupivacaine heavy 3 ml, preservative free 1 mg nalbuphine made 3.5 ml with NS. Onset & duration of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, sedative effect, time of two segment regression, duration of analgesia and requirement of rescue analgesia, side effects/complications, if any were observed. Statistical analysis: Unpaired t-test was used for statistical analysis on IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21. p-value significant if <0.05. Results: Group BM provided short onset of sensory and motor block, longer duration of anaesthesia & post-operative analgesia, sedative effect and longer two-segment regression time as compare to group BN when used as adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine. Conclusion: Midazolam is better adjuvant compare to nalbuphine when used intrathecally with bupivacaine 0.5% heavy provides longer duration of anaesthesia, sedation and post operative analgesia.
Authors and Affiliations
Sujay Thakkar
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP619484
- DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6219.45
- Views 99
- Downloads 0
The Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Palanosetron, Ondansetron and Metoclopramide in the Control of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomitting (PONV)
Background and Aims: PostOperative Nausea and Vomitting (PONV) Continues to be a highly undesirable outcome of anaesthesia and SX. We compared the efficacy of Palanosetron, Ondansetron an Metoclopramide in the control of...
Comparison of Equipotent Doses of Cisatracurium and Rocuronium at Bhuj, Kutch
Background and Aim: For several decades, suxamethonium was the gold standard relaxant for rapid sequence intubation. However, the unintended side-effects such as muscle fasciculation, hyperkalemia, rise in intracranial a...
A Comparative Study between Intrathecal Clonidine and Buprenorphine with Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Lower Abdominal Surgeries
Purpose: Subarachnoid (spinal) block is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia when the surgical site is located on the lower extremities, perineum (eg, surgery on the genitalia or anus), or lower body wa...
Comparative Study of Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% and Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% with Fentanyl in Pre-Eclamptic Parturients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section
Aim: To evaluate the time of onset, duration of sensory blockade & motor blockade, haemodynamic effects, time duration of post-operative analgesia as well as complications of intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% and intrathecal...
A Comparison Study Quality of Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Clonidine versus Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Midazolam
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most commonly used anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. Despite of using long acting local anesthetic like Bupivacaine, the duration of anesthesia is short. Therefore, various drug comb...