Alvarado Score Still Holds: A Prospective Comparison of Modified Alvarado Score [MAS] and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score [AIRS] as a Diagnostic Aid in Acute Appendicitis

Abstract

Introduction: In pre-imaging era, diagnosis of appendicitis was based on clinical assessment. To decrease chances of error and negative appendectomy, Alvarado was first to propose a score in 1885. A number of scores were then put forward including modification of Alvarado score. This study aimed to compare two most commonly used systems, MAS and AIRS. Methods: On admission MAS and AIRS were compared in patients of right iliac fossa pain who subsequently underwent appendectomy. Histopathologic examination was taken as gold standard outcome and MAS and AIRS as tests under evaluation. Results: Study analysed 229 patients with a mean age of 32.69 years and male to female ratio of 1.04. Female patients were older than male patients [35.25 and 30.14 years, respectively; p=0.017]. Negative appendectomy rate was just under 4%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MAS were 85%, 44.4%, 97.4% and 10.8% and for AIRS were 81.8%, 11.1%, 95.7% and 2.4%. Sensitivity in children and adolescents was 90% and 72.5% for MAS and AIRS, respectively. There was no gender difference between the two. AUC for ROC curve of MAS and AIRS was 0.669 [0.474-0.863] and 0.481 [0.285-0.677] with a significant difference [p=0.0003]. Conclusion: Both scores are sensitive, underdiagnose patients as low risk, but don’t leave any patient with advanced appendicitis. MAS outperforms AIRS for all cases of appendicitis as well as advanced appendicitis. Since both scores classify a large number of patients as low risk, before deciding a surgical intervention, an imaging aid should always be welcome.

Authors and Affiliations

Varun Kumar Singh, Bikram Kharga, Kumar Nishant, Phuchungla Bhutia, Barun Kumar Sharma, Neha Pandey

Keywords

Related Articles

Study to identify dietary factors and life style patterns responsible for gall stones among north Karnatakapatients

Introduction:Gall stone disease is common problem in Indian subcontinent.Cholelithiasis has increasingly become a major cause of morbidity, leading to hospital admission and surgery in the developing world. There has als...

Aspiration and methylprednisolone injection to the cavity with IV cannula needle in the treatment of volar wrist ganglia

Objective: There are several types of treatment modalities recommended for wrist ganglions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cyst aspiration and methyl prednisolone acetate injection by usin...

Reliability of goniometry to determine the hip range of motion

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of goniometric measurements when measuring the hip joint. Also this study aimed at determining the validity and reliabilit...

Comparison of Predictive Validity of Alvarado Score and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score, A Hospital Based Observational Study

Introduction: Various new risk stratification scores have been proposed to accurately diagnose appendicitis. In the wake of limited number of comparative studies of these new scores, with the existing scores, the current...

Vesical calculi in children

Vesical calculi occur due to increased urinary concentration & are commonly seen in children belonging to low socioeconomic status. They are usually formed of ammonium acid urate, calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate. Ve...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP227184
  • DOI 10.17511
  • Views 201
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Varun Kumar Singh, Bikram Kharga, Kumar Nishant, Phuchungla Bhutia, Barun Kumar Sharma, Neha Pandey (2016). Alvarado Score Still Holds: A Prospective Comparison of Modified Alvarado Score [MAS] and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score [AIRS] as a Diagnostic Aid in Acute Appendicitis. Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics, 2(3), 21-28. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-227184