An Analysis of the Theory of Justice against the Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt in the Judge's Decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso Case

Abstract

This research aims to find out the theory of justice that can be used by judges in proving criminal cases in Indonesia and the use of the theory of justice in the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt in the judge's decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso case. This research uses normative legal research methods with legal philosophy, legislation and conceptual approaches. The data source used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials analyzed qualitatively with deductive inference, starting with general principles and concepts about the theory of justice and the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt, the analysis moves towards specific propositions to determine the value of justice and the relevance of this standard in the judge's decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso case. The study found that Gustav Radbruch's theory of justice can be applied by judges in Indonesian criminal cases, using six evidentiary parameters: theory of evidence, minimum evidence, evidence, presentation of evidence, burden of proof, and strength of proof. These parameters reflect Radbruch's legal values of justice, purpose, and legal certainty. Judges using Radbruch's theory prioritize justice, followed by purpose and legal certainty. In Jessica's case, despite doubts about the evidence, the judges found her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, aligning with Radbruch's principle that justice should take precedence in the standard of proof.

Authors and Affiliations

Jayanto Timbang, Aloysius Wisnubroto, Hyronimus Rhiti

Keywords

Related Articles

Understanding Digital Technology Integration in Merchant Marine College: Examining Teacher Digital Competency through TAM Framework

This study examines the relationship between teacher digital competency and technology adoption in maritime vocational education institutions. The research aims to investigate how digital competency influences perceived...

Retrospective Study of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Patients with Thyroid Nodule in Benghazi in the Period of (2021-2023)

Background: Thyroid nodules constitute a common endocrine disorder, these nodules could be solitary, multiple, cystic, or solid. Increasing age, female gender, iodine deficiency, and history of thyroid radiation all are...

Prediction Using SVM and DT

Diabetes is recognized as a severe and persistent illness that leads to an elevation in blood sugar levels. Untreated and undetected diabetes can give rise to numerous complications. The laborious process of identificati...

Legal Protection for Deposit Customers Who Are Not Recorded after BPR’s Business License Is Revoked

Third-party fund collectors by Rural Banks (BPR) using a pick-up service system bear the risk of internal bank misconduct leading to the omission of customer deposits in the BPR's records. The research method employed is...

Analysis of Risk Factors for Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever Using a Geospatial Approach in the Telaga Biru Community Health Center

Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever is an acute viral infectious disease caused by the dengue virus which is characterized by fever lasting 2-7 days accompanied by manifestations of bleeding, decreased platelets (thrombocytopenia),...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP745121
  • DOI 10.47191/ijmra/v7-i09-34
  • Views 52
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jayanto Timbang, Aloysius Wisnubroto, Hyronimus Rhiti (2024). An Analysis of the Theory of Justice against the Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt in the Judge's Decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso Case. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(09), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-745121