Business and Government: Environmental and Economic Responsibility in the Russian Arctic

Journal Title: Arctic and North - Year 2020, Vol 41, Issue 41

Abstract

The growing interest in environmental problems on the part of society leads to the fact that more and more attention is paid to the activities of enterprises, and the criteria for the greening of their production are becoming more stringent. With the growth of industrial production, the scale of the negative impact on the environment increases, so simply discussing environmental problems becomes insufficient. There is a need for a comprehensive accounting of the environmental performance of organizations and the development of measures to compensate for the resulting environmental damage. The article examines the issues of environmental and economic relations between business and government in the Russian Arctic. The purpose of this study is to form a theoretical approach to solving the problem of greening the Arctic regions based on the analysis of the ecological and economic relations between government and business. Legal and economic instruments for regulating environmental protection in Russia, as well as strategic documents for the development of the Russian Arctic in the field of ecology are analyzed. An assessment of the environmental and economic responsibility of companies operating in the Russian Arctic is carried out on the basis of non-financial reporting data. The results of the analysis show that the presented non-financial information is not transparent enough, and the level of business responsibility is rather low. To solve the problem posed, the authors propose a theoretical approach to building a "green" partnership, which allows finding a compromise between the interests of the state and business. The formation of an integrated ecological and economic approach in the state regulation of environmental protection activities will allow reaching a point of bifurcation in the relationship between government and business and thereby leveling the anthropogenic load on the ecosystem of the territory.

Authors and Affiliations

Natalya V. DYADIK, Anastasiya N. CHAPARGINA

Keywords

Related Articles

Tourist Attractiveness Based on the National and Territorial Identity of the Northern Region: The Example of the Republic of Karelia

This article raises an extremely relevant for Russia topic of domestic tourism as a driving factor of regional development at the socio-economic level. The region of study is the Republic of Karelia (RK). The object of t...

Industrial Development of the Territories of the Arctic Zone of Yakutia and Ethnological Expertise of Investment Projects

The purpose of the work is to assess the consequences of the industrial development of the territories of traditional nature management of the indigenous peoples of the North. In order to achieve the goal, the investment...

Social Risks of Achieving Sustainable Development in the Arctic Region

The sustainable development of circumpolar countries is of great importance for the whole world, because the Arctic Region is currently experiencing an unprecedented level of economic activity. From the perspective of th...

Logistic Basis for the Development of Arctic Tourism in Russia

In our article we analyzed the transport accessibility of the subjects of the Arctic zone of Russian Federa-tion for potential tourists. To do this, we estimated in points the material and time costs of tourists, trav-el...

On the collective monograph “Ethnonational processes in the Arctic: trends, problems, and prospects”

The article represents the review of the collective monograph “Ethnonational processes in the Arctic: trends, problems, and prospects.” The monograph is an original joint work of researchers at Russian research centers s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP692054
  • DOI 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.41.38
  • Views 205
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Natalya V. DYADIK, Anastasiya N. CHAPARGINA (2020). Business and Government: Environmental and Economic Responsibility in the Russian Arctic. Arctic and North, 41(41), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-692054