Combination of different clinical reasoning tests in a national exam
Journal Title: Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism - Year 2019, Vol 7, Issue 4
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical reasoning as a critical and high level of clinical competency should be acquired during medical education, and medical educators should attempt to assess this ability in medical students. Nowadays, there are several ways to evaluate medical students’ clinical reasoning ability in different countries worldwide. There are some well-known clinical reasoning tests such as Key Feature (KF), Clinical Reasoning Problem (CRP), Script Concordance Test (SCT), and Comprehensive Integrative Puzzle (CIP). Each of these tests has its advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we evaluated the reliability of combination of clinical reasoning tests SCT, KF, CIP, and CRP in one national exam and the correlation between the subtest scores of these tests together with the total score of the exam. Methods: A total of 339 high ranked medical students from 60 medical schools in Iran participated in a national exam named “Medical Olympiad”. The ninth Medical Olympiad was held in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, under the direct supervision of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education in summer 2017. The expert group designed a combination of four types of clinical reasoning tests to assess both analytical and non-analytical clinical reasoning. Mean scores of SCT, CRP, KF, and CIP were measured using descriptive statistics. Reliability was calculated for each test and the combination of tests using Cronbach’s alpha. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the score of each subtest and the total score. SPSS version 21 was used for data analysis and the level of significance was considered <0.05. Results: The reliability of the combination of tests was 0.815. The reliability of KF was 0.81 and 0.76, 0.80, and 0.92 for SCT, CRP, and CIP, respectively. The mean total score was 169.921±41.54 from 240. All correlations between each clinical reasoning test and total score were significant (P<0.001). The highest correlation (0.887) was seen between CIP score and total score. Conclusion: The study showed that combining different clinical reasoning tests can be a reliable way of measuring this ability.
Authors and Affiliations
ANAHITA SADEGHI, ALI ALI ASGARI, NEZARALI MOULAEI, VAHID MOHAMMADKARIMI, SOMAYEH DELAVARI, MITRA AMINI, SETAREH NASIRI, ROGHAYEH AKBARI, MOJGAN SANJARI, IRAJ SEDIGHI, PARISA KHOSHNEVISASL, MANOUCHEHR KHOSHBATEN, SAEED SAFARI, LEILY MOHAJERZADEH, BERNARD CHARLIN
Self- directed learning barriers in a virtual environment: a qualitative study
Introduction: There is a growing trend in online education courses in higher education institutes. Previous studies have shown that high levels of self-direction are essential for successful online learning. The present...
Setting objectives for a competency-based undergraduate obstetrics and gynecology curriculum
Introduction: Little emphasis on standardization, less stringent outcome measurement and resource constrains can result in deteriorating competencies among medical graduates in a country with rapidly increasing number of...
The usefulness of crossword puzzle as a self-learning tool in pharmacology
Introduction: Pharmacology is perceived as a volatile subject as it’s difficult to recall and recite the core of the subject. Enriching the learning environment through incorporation of a variety of teaching and learning...
Develop talents to increase productivity: report of the ninth national medical science olympiad in Islamic Republic of Iran in year 2017
Extracurricular activities for the gifted and talented students in Iran derive from the belief that students with high potentials are expected to make great help for the health care of the community. One of these activit...
Effectiveness of microteaching as a method of developing teaching competence among in-service medical teachers
Introduction: In spite of the fact that microteaching has been practiced extensively in most universities, its actual efficacy has not been studied systematically. In this study, there was an attempt to quantify the effi...