COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS DEXAMETHASONE AS AN ADJUVANT FOR SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK.

Journal Title: GJRA-Global Journal For Research Analysis - Year 2019, Vol 8, Issue 5

Abstract

Introduction: Brachial plexus block is the most preferred anaesthetic technique for upper limb surgeries. Adding adjuvant to local anaesthetics for brachial plexus block may enhance the duration and quality of analgesia and also to decrease the dose of postoperative opioid analgesic. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine when added as adjuvant during supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (BPB) in respect to the onset and duration of sensory and motor block along with duration of analgesia. Methods: Sixty ASA physical status I-II patients of age group between 20 to 60 years with elective forearm and hand surgery under brachial plexus blocks were randomly allocated into two equal groups in a randomised double blind fashion. Group DM (n = 30), to receive 15 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 15 ml of 2% lignocaine with Adr + 1 ml of Dexmedetomidine (50mcg) + 1ml distilled water, making a total of 32 ml and another Group DX (n = 25), to receive 15 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 15 ml of 2% lignocaine with Adr. + 2ml of Dexamethasone (8 mg). A nerve stimulation technique was used in all patients. The onset time and duration of sensory and motor blocks, quality of intraoperative analgesia and duration of analgesia were assessed. Results: The time of onset of sensory and motor block was signi􀃶cantly less in group DM as compared to group DX (P < 0.05). The duration of the sensory and motor block as well as duration of post operative analgesia was signi􀃶cantly more in group DM as compared with group DX (P<0.05), but there was no statistically signi􀃶cant difference between both the groups with respect to the heart rate, mean arterial pressure and spo2. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine 50 g was more effective than dexamethasone 8 mg in extending the duration of supraclavicular brachial plexus block and prolonging the duration of post operative analgesia and it also signi􀃶cantly decreases the onset time of block.

Authors and Affiliations

Ankit singh, Neelesh Nema*

Keywords

Related Articles

CAN SCORE VERSUS OTHER ANTHROPOMETRIC INDICES TO ASSESS NUTRITIONAL STATUS IN NEW-BORNS

Background: Foetal malnutrition is one of the common cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates in a developing country like India and needs to be identified at birth. Objective: To assess foetal nutrition using CAN sc...

ENSEMBLE OF TWITTER FEATURE SETS AND CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS FOR SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION

Sentiment analysis of Twitter information. Sentiment or utilizes the Naive Bayes Classi􀃶er to classify Tweets into positive, negative neutral, or negation we have a tendency to gift experimental analysis of our Live Revi...

Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus –A Rare Case Report

Pilonidal sinus is a common disease of sacrococcygeal region involving natal cleft. However, it is also observed in the periumbilical area. There are only a few reports about umbilical pilonidal sinus in the literature....

FINANCIAL DISTRESS INDICATORS OF INDIAN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES– A FACTOR ANALYSIS APPROACH

Manufacturing sector is critical for any developing economy. Indian manufacturing sector, contributing to around 17% to country’s GDP is witnessing widespread distress. Many companies are reporting losses for continuous...

Study of Outcome of Extra-Articular Metaphyseal Lower Third Tibia-Fibula Fractures Treated Using Fibula Rush-Pin and Cast

Lower third Tibia and Fibula fractures are common in adult population. Tibial pilon fractures encompass a spectrum of skeletal injury ranging from fractures caused by low-energy rotational forces to those precipitated by...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP581851
  • DOI -
  • Views 113
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ankit singh, Neelesh Nema* (2019). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS DEXAMETHASONE AS AN ADJUVANT FOR SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK.. GJRA-Global Journal For Research Analysis, 8(5), 41-43. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-581851