Comparatives Effectiveness of Two Vetiveria Grasses Species Chrysopogon zizanioides and Chrysopogon nigritana for the Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Heavy Metals

Journal Title: Journal of Experimental Agriculture International - Year 2015, Vol 8, Issue 6

Abstract

The study was carried out at the screen house of the Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (I.A.R&T) to determine the responses of two vetiver grasses cultivars (Vetiver zizanioides and Vetiver nigritana) on four different contaminated soils and their potential to remediate metal contaminated soil. The experiment was a 3 x 4 factorial experiment arrange in a randomized complete block design and replicated thrice. There were three levels of vetiveria grasses (V. zizanioides, V. nigritana, and no vetiver) and four contaminated soils. The absorption of metal contaminants like lead, cadmium, and zinc by the two vetiver cultivars was determined in all treatments. In mechanic village soil, V. zizanioides absorbed more of zinc followed by V. nigritana with percentage reduction of 7.0 and 5.9 respectively. In industrial waste soil, the percentage reduction of heavy metal in the soil was 27.6 and 18.8 by V. zizanioides and V. nigritana, respectively. Also in urban waste soil, there was a percentage reduction of 13.7 and 6.1 by V. nigritana and V. zizanioides, respectively. In mechanic village soil, V. nigritana absorbed more of cadmium in the soil than V. zizanioides with percentage reduction of cadmium being 30.5 and 26.2 respectively. In urban waste soil, there were percentage reductions of 7.1 and 6.8 in V. nigritana and V. zizanioides. In mechanic village soil, V. nigritana absorbed more of lead than V. zizanioides with percentage reduction of 36.3 and 43.4 respectively. In urban waste soil, there were percentage reduction of 10.2 and 6.3 by V. zizanioides and V. nigritana respectively. In industrial waste soil, there were percentage reduction of 39.2 and 29.9 by V. zizanioides and V. nigritana respectively. Vetiver nigritana, the local variety, proved to have the great potential of phytoextracting the heavy metals in the contaminated soils than the exotic cultivar (V. zizanioides).

Authors and Affiliations

M. O. Adigun, K. S. Are

Keywords

Related Articles

Changes of Photosynthetic and Antioxidant Activity of Phaseolus vulgaris to Potassium

Greenhouse experiment was conducted with two cultivars of common beans and four concentrations of potassium (1, 2, 10 and 20 millimolar –mM ) were supplied to the soil pots aiming to access variations in plant antioxidan...

Modelling the Dual Potential of Cowpea in the Lawra-Yagtuuri in the Upper West Region

Aims: This research was conducted in pot of trials at the farm land of Lawra-Yagtuuri in the Upper West Region to determine the effect of Rhizobia inoculants, Boostxtra, and appropriate Phosphorus Fertilizer level requir...

An Evaluation of Profit Margin of Sawyers of Wood Products in the Forestry Zone Surrounding Kumba (Cameroon)

A total of 235 chainsaw milling (CSM) operations have been visited from 1st June to 31st July 2011 in order to interview 85 sawyers from 15 villages in the forestry zone surrounding Kumba, Cameroon. In the field, four ca...

Impact of Foliar Application of Growth Regulators and Micronutrients on the Performance of Darjeeling Mandarin

Impact of Foliar Application of Growth Regulators and Micronutrients on the Performance of Darjeeling Mandarin

Effect of Phosphorus and Zinc on Growth, Flowering and Yield of Gladiolus

The investigations were conducted in the Horticulture Farm, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh during November 2013 to March 2014. The studies were conducted on two factors Phosphorus and Zinc, wher...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP353770
  • DOI 10.9734/AJEA/2015/13359
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. O. Adigun, K. S. Are (2015). Comparatives Effectiveness of Two Vetiveria Grasses Species Chrysopogon zizanioides and Chrysopogon nigritana for the Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Heavy Metals. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 8(6), 361-366. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-353770