Comparison between physiotherapeutic alone and combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological measures in deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in joint replacement and spinal surgeries

Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is one of the common and dreaded complication of joint replacements, hip and spine surgeries. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis among these cases is significant in spite of the various prophylactic measure such as physiotherapy and pharmacological measures. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in our Institute between January 2014 to June 2017. The study included patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacements for various cases and spinal surgeries during the same year. We had a total of 195 patients in the study. Among these, 65 patients were given DVT prophylaxis by physiotherapeutic measure such as foot pump and pneumatic compression device and 130 were given combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological prophylaxis by giving Low molecular weight heparin postoperatively. Post operatively patients were assessed for DVT both clinically and by Doppler Study Results: A total of 8 patients out of 65 among the physiotherapeutic alone group developed thrombosis [12%]. Among 130 patients who were given prophylaxis by combined measures 9 patients developed thrombosis [07%]. So the results of our study have shown that combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological measure have an edge over the physiotherapeutic measure alone. Conclusion: Researches which have been done previously have shown that there is no difference in the incidence of DVT among patients treated by other physiotherapeutic and pharmacological measures alone. In our study the result of combined methods was found to be better than physiotherapy measure alone. Hence, the incidence of DVT among the replacement and spine surgeries can be reduced by combined modalities of prophylaxis.845

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Raju KP, Dr. Madhuchandra P, Dr. Pawankumar KM, Dr. Arun KN, Dr. Nandeesh

Keywords

Related Articles

Ha-Eri Chari procedure for recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder

Background: To evaluate the functional outcome following Ha-Eri Chari procedure as treatment for recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder. Materials and methods: This study is a prospective study. 20 patients aged 20 t...

Choice of implant in stable intertrochanteric fracture femur: PFNA vs DHS

Introduction: The best treatment for trochanteric fracture remains controversial Many methods have been recommended. Stable fixation that allows early mobilization is the treatment of choice. In this study, we aimed to c...

Selection of implant based on CT evaluation of trochanteric & subtrochanteric fractures

Background: CT scan evaluation of the morphology of trochanteric & subtrochanteric fractures helps in the selection of appropriate implant for fixation of proximal femoral fractures, resulting in better surgical outcome....

Comparison of femoral foot prints in acute V/S chronic ACL injury

The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in the presence of the femoral footprints (lateral intercondylar ridge and the lateral bifurcate ridge) between patients with acute and chronic ACL injuries...

Reconstruction of ruptured archilles tendon using peroneus brevis tendon transfer to OS calcis

Background: Increase in the incidence of reruptures after non operative management of ruptured Achilles tendon and advances in operative modalities led to primary surgical management of Achilles tendon ruptures in the ma...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP482667
  • DOI 10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i4l.115
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Raju KP, Dr. Madhuchandra P, Dr. Pawankumar KM, Dr. Arun KN, Dr. Nandeesh (2017). Comparison between physiotherapeutic alone and combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological measures in deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in joint replacement and spinal surgeries. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 3(4), 845-848. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-482667