Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development

Journal Title: Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 4

Abstract

Background: Clean air action plans have been prepared and are still being implemented in Turkey to control and prevent air pollution, and improve the air quality. The plans reveal a picture of the current situation and available inventory information. However, in order to implement the identified plans in real life, they need to be prioritized. This study aimed to identify and prioritize clean air action plans for Turkey using a framework of both fuzzy and crisp evaluations. Methods: In this study, priorities of the plans were identified and analyzed with a decision-making model. A three-step research methodology was provided. First, literature was reviewed regarding sustainable development and action plans. Second, in order to narrow and specify action plans, the nominal group technique (NGT) was implemented. Finally, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and best-worst method (BWM) surveys were applied to environmental engineers and experts working on sustainable development to prioritize the action plans. Results: It was revealed that heating dimension is considered as the most important criterion with the weight of 0.7469 in fuzzy AHP and 0.758 in BWM. AP1 with a weight of 0.3356 in fuzzy AHP and AP3 with a weight of 0.3289 in BWM were the most important sub-criteria, which are the plans for reducing coal use ranked at the forefront in reducing air pollution. Conclusion: According to the results, there is no significant difference in the priority ranking results. The results of fuzzy AHP and BWM are very similar. For example, traffic criterion has the best performance in both methods in the evaluation of decision makers. In addition, the main and sub-criteria with the lowest priority are the same in these two methods.

Authors and Affiliations

Ahmet Çalık

Keywords

Related Articles

Biomonitoring of heavy metal signatures in urbanized contaminated ecosystems of Southern India: A case study using raptor, Athene brama

Background: Heavy metals remain tenacious in the environment which further leads to emerging bioaccumulation, rising through the food chain. Birds are great environmental sentinels that can spot even the smallest chang...

Global evaluation of potentially harmful elements (PHEs) in potato and carrot irrigated by wastewater: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and health risk assessment

Background: We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis on the concentration of potentially harmful elements (PHEs) in carrots and potatoes irrigated by wastewater and estimate non-carcinogenic health risks among adult and child...

The concentration and human health risks attributed to pesticide residues in cucumber: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Prolonged consumption of vegetables containing pesticide residues can pose a risk to the health of individuals over time. Methods: This study aimed to retrieve the studies on the concentration of pesticides...

Trend analysis of Humidex as a heat discomfort index using Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator statistical tests

Background: The aim of this research was to assess the Humidex (HD) trends as a thermal discomfort index by analyzing meteorological data during a 30 year period of summertime in Iran. Methods: For this purpose, data re...

Optimization of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from meat processing wastewaters using microalgal biofilms

Background: The conventional activated sludge processes are not able to completely treat the nitrogen and phosphorus compounds of meat processing wastewaters. Microalgal biofilm, which has the advantages of easiness and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP676160
  • DOI 10.15171/EHEM.2019.29
  • Views 268
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ahmet Çalık (2019). Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 6(4), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-676160