Comparison of orotracheal versus nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation in simulated cervical spine patients, under conscious sedation

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction and Aims Airway management in a patient with cervical spine injury is considered a challenge Minimizing neck movement and maintaining head in neutral position is essential to prevent secondary neurological injury Flexible fibreoptic intubation causes minimal cervical spine movement In this study we evaluated and compared orotracheal and nasotracheal flexible fibreoptic intubation in a patient with simulated cervical spine injury using a cervical collar under conscious sedationMaterials and Methods Sixty patients were randomly allocated into oral and nasal groups After premedication and preperation with Xylometazoline nasal drops and lignocaine nebulization bolus fentanyl and propofol infusion was started to achieve concious sedation Flexible fibreoptic intubation was performed orally or nasally after placement of a cervical collar Operator ease and hemodynamics were moniteredResult In the oral group 867 and in the nasal group 933 first attempts were successful The ease of fibreoptic intubation was graded to be excellent in a significantly greater number of patients in the nasal group as compared to the oral group Hemodynamic variability though present was not clinically relevent this might have been secondary to use of adequate sedationConclusion The ease of fibreoptic intubation in simulated cervical spine injury under conscious sedation was found to be significantly better in the nasotracheal group Hemodynamic stability was demonstrated in both the groups in our studyKeywords Cervical spine Simulated cervical spine Fibreoptic intubation Oral fibreoptic intubation Nasal fibreoptic intubation Conscious sedation

Authors and Affiliations

Tarang Jain, Lalit Gupta, Manoj Bhardwaj

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus esmolol (Intravenously) in reduction of cardiovascular responses to intubation during induction of general anesthesia- A randomised clinical trial

Introduction and Aim: The cardiovascular changes to airway manipulation like tachycardia and hypertension occur secondary to catecholamine secretion. These changes make less effects on normal patients but can be hazardou...

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication on attenuation of intraocular pressure changes after succinylcholine and endotracheal intubation

Introduction: Succinylcholine, is one of the most commonly used muscle relaxant for rapid sequence airway management. It increases the Intraocular pressure (IOP) which is deleterious in open globe injuries. We studied th...

Comparison of thyromental height test(TMH) with modified mallampati test and thyromental distance for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: a prospective study

Introduction: No anesthesia is safe unless diligent efforts are made to secure and maintain an intact airway. Various tests have been in practice i.e., Modified Mallampati Test(MMT), Thyromental Distance(TMD), Sternoment...

Ophthalmological changes after posterior spine surgeries: A prospective study

Introduction: Postoperative visual loss (POVL) after posterior approach to spine surgeries is a devastating complication necessitating a prospective study. The primary aim was to identify ophthalmological changes contrib...

Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterization using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach

Aims and Objectives: Supraclavicular approach (SC) is less popular route of subclavian vein catheterization than infraclavicular approach (IC). The aim of the study was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of subc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP476530
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0113
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tarang Jain, Lalit Gupta, Manoj Bhardwaj (2018). Comparison of orotracheal versus nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation in simulated cervical spine patients, under conscious sedation. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 5(4), 603-608. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-476530