COMPARISON OF PREOPERATIVE TOPICAL NEPAFENAC (0.1%), FLURBIPROFEN (0.03%) AND KETOROLAC (0.4%) EYE DROPS IN MAINTAINING MYDRIASIS DURING PHACOEMULSIFICATION- A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 40

Abstract

BACKGROUND Phacoemulsification with IOL implantation is the current surgical treatment of choice for cataract extraction. Intraoperative manipulation during surgery triggers inflammatory cascade resulting in miosis, pain, inflammation or cystoid macular oedema. Adequate pupillary dilatation and its maintenance is required for proper anterior capsule incision and nucleus delivery and IOL implantation failing which may lead to complications. Aim- This study compares the effectiveness of prophylactic administration of topical flurbiprofen 0.03%, nepafenac 0.1% and ketorolac 0.4% in maintaining mydriasis during phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in the capsular bag. MATERIALS AND METHODS It is a prospective, randomised, double blind study involving 120 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification which were randomly and equally divided into four groups receiving topical nepafenac 0.1% (Group 1), flurbiprofen 0.03% (Group 2), ketorolac 0.4% (Group 3), placebo CMC 0.5% (Group 4) prior to the surgery. Pupil diameters were recorded at different stages of surgery and the mean value was compared. All the data was analysed with the software SPSS 20.0. Chi square test and ANOVA was used for comparison amongst the four groups. RESULTS Total 120 eyes were included, 50 females and 70 males of mean age 59.458 ± 8.74 years. The pupil diameter at the baseline was comparable in all four groups. Significant difference was seen in the pupil diameter in all the groups; however, nepafenac group had the least decrease in the pupil diameter at the end of surgery (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION Topical nepafenac has shown to be a potent inhibitor of miosis during phacoemulsification and also maintained the mydriasis throughout the procedure as compared to topical flurbiprofen, ketorolac and placebo.

Authors and Affiliations

Supriya Mushrif, Kaynat Patel

Keywords

Related Articles

 CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF HODGKIN LYMPHOMA IN A SOUTH INDIAN CITY

 Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is a malignant disease of B lymphocyte, characterized by the presence of diagnostic Reed-Sternberg cells in an appropriate cellular microenvironment WHO (2008) classification consists of Nod...

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING AND DYNAMIC HIP SCREW FIXATION

BACKGROUND Hip fractures are usually common in elderly patients with osteoporosis intertrochanteric fracture accounting for approximately half of the hip fractures in these elderly patients, out of this more than 50% fra...

CLINICAL STUDY AND MANAGEMENT OF PERITONITIS SECONDARY TO HOLLOW VISCOUS PERFORATION

BACKGROUND Hollow viscous perforation causing peritonitis (Secondary) is the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Peptic ulcer perforation is being the most common cause in developing countries like India,1 whereas...

CLINICOEPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF LEPROSY IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER- A THREE YEAR STUDY

BACKGROUND Leprosy is a major public health problem in developing countries. India dominates the global picture with 60% of the world's leprosy cases. This study was done to bring about the current trends in the clinicoe...

 EPIDEMIOLOGY OF POLYTRAUMA IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

 Polytrauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries. The term “Polytrauma” is mainly used to describe blunt trauma patients whose injuries involve multiple body regio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP213292
  • DOI 10.14260/Jemds/2017/689
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Supriya Mushrif, Kaynat Patel (2017). COMPARISON OF PREOPERATIVE TOPICAL NEPAFENAC (0.1%), FLURBIPROFEN (0.03%) AND KETOROLAC (0.4%) EYE DROPS IN MAINTAINING MYDRIASIS DURING PHACOEMULSIFICATION- A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 6(40), 3189-3192. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-213292