Comparison Quality of Health Services between Public and Private Providers: The Iranian People’s Perspective

Journal Title: Electronic Physician - Year 2016, Vol 8, Issue 9

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health services quality has been the most important criteria of judging, and its improvement causes people's satisfaction of health systems. In a health system, public and private sectors provide services and typically have been effective in promoting health services quality of community. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of health services in both public and private sectors from the perspective of residents in Qazvin (Iran). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2014. The study population included all residents of Qazvin Province, and the sample size was estimated to 1002. The research tool was a perceptions of services quality standard questionnaire. Data were collected by trained interviewers visiting homes and were analyzed by IBM-SPSS software version 22 and t-test and linear regression. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.91 and test-re-test coefficient was 83%. RESULTS: 741 people (74%) in their last visit to receive services were referred to the public sector. Between the perception of people participating in the study about medical equipment and supplies, welfare facilities, competence and experience of doctor, waiting time, rapid reception, and access to doctor in public and private sectors, significant differences were observed (p < 0.05). In the tangible realm in perception of health services, there was a significant difference in quality between the public and private sectors (p < 0.05). In addition, place of receiving services, waiting time, education, occupation, and type of received services were affecting factors in regards to perceptions of health services from the perspective of Iran's population (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results showed the importance of a tangible realm on people's satisfaction of health services. It seems that the public sector should pay more attention to this issue

Authors and Affiliations

Alijanzadeh M, Zare SA, Rajaee R, Fard SM, Asefzadeh S, Gholami S

Keywords

Related Articles

Public sexual health promotion interventions and strategies: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION: Sexual health promotion is the process of enabling people to increase control over their sexual health that should be based on people's needs and abilities. The aim of this study was to explore public sexua...

Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Liver Cirrhosis and Fatty Liver: Correlation with Cardiac Performance.

The aims of the present study were to assess the serum BNP level in patients with post hepatitis C liver cirrhosis and patients with fatty liver and to determine the correlation between BNP and the severity of liver dise...

Carotid arterial stent implantation follow-up and results in 50 patients: preliminary report

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered as a safe and effective procedure for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Evaluation of this procedure's complications is essential for proper clinical decision-m...

Organizational Climate and Work Addiction in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, 2014: a Case Study.

The occupational nature of employees in headquarters units of the University requires them to deal with support issues. Thus, there is some pressure on these employees to complete their assignments on time so that employ...

Probiotic for irritable bowel syndrome in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder in children. Recently, probiotics have been suggested as a treatment option for gastrointestinal disorders. The most effective species and the most app...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP331605
  • DOI 10.19082/2935
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alijanzadeh M, Zare SA, Rajaee R, Fard SM, Asefzadeh S, Gholami S (2016). Comparison Quality of Health Services between Public and Private Providers: The Iranian People’s Perspective. Electronic Physician, 8(9), 2935-2941. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-331605