Conclusion

Journal Title: Religions - Year 2018, Vol 9, Issue 4

Abstract

Vertovec (2007) coined the concept of superdiversity, focusing on the multiple variables required to analyze the social status and everyday lives of migrants in Britain. Social scientists have extended this term to those societies characterized by a high level of immigration coming from all over the world. According to Becci et al. (2016), religion was not initially considered a relevant variable. Scholars have changed this approach to include religion only over recent years. The empirical research and the case studies we collected in this special issue provide evidence of the fruitfulness of the concept of religious superdiversity (Levitt 2007; Kivisto 2014; Stolz and Monnot 2018). First, it is a useful methodological tool. Secondly, it opens new theoretical perspectives, which can dismantle stereotypes that circulate in contemporary society. In summary, the main trends that the authors outline in their respective articles are as follows: (a) Religious diversity concerns not only the various systems of believing and belonging which coexist and compete in a given society, affected by migrants’ flow, but also the internal differences of ethnicity, language, juridical customs, gender variables, latent or manifest theological cleavages, and different ideological orientations, which emerge in each system; (b) Religious diversity, at the same time, represents a more appropriate narrative than the descriptive and socio-graphic concept of multiculturalism (Kymlicka 1995), and that actually implies a reification of the identity of immutable religious communities; (c) Religious diversity represents a social laboratory in which we can observe the struggle for recognition (Honneth 1996) by various socio-religious actors who claim a legal status or equal treatment by the state in comparison with the majority religion; (d) Religious diversity, therefore, denotes a new type of symbolic conflict in contemporary societies that overlaps with and sometimes mystifies much more concrete economic, political, and social conflicts; (e) Religious diversity is a descriptive term, whereas pluralism refers to a normative approach to the phenomenon; it is the methodological tool recommended by Beckford (2000) to separate fact and value or, in Habermas (1996), fact and norms; (f) Religious diversity works as an empirical test for many traditional concepts such as tolerance, civil religion, democracy, secular state, and, of course, pluralism; (g) Last but not least, the symbolic boundaries of the diverse religions which share the same potentially sacred territory are more porous; this could encourage exchange, conversion, border-crossing movements, and, conversely, defense attitudes, mental closure, fundamentalist tendencies, and so on.

Authors and Affiliations

Enzo Pace

Keywords

Related Articles

Constituting Canon and Community in Eleventh Century Tibet: The Extant Writings of Rongzom and His Charter of Mantrins (sngags pa’i bca’ yig)

This paper explores some of the work of Rongzom Chökyi Zangpo (hereafter Rongzom) and attempts to situate his pedagogical influence within the “Old School” or Nyingma (rnying ma) tradition of Tibetan Buddhism1. A surve...

The Glorified Body: Corporealities in the Catholic Tradition

The rise of new technologies—robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotechnology among them—gave the American computer scientist Bill Joy certain pause for deep concern; these, he cautioned, carry the very real poten...

One Philosopher’s Bug Can Be Another’s Feature: Reply to Almeida’s “Multiverse and Divine Creation”

Michael Almeida once told me that he thought we were just a couple of hours of conversation away from reaching deep agreement about some important topics in the philosophy of religion pertaining to God, multiverses, an...

Entering the Mindset of Violent Religious Activists

How can one enter the mindset of religious activists whose worldview and values are different from one’s own? This is the challenge for analyzing contemporary violent religious movements and individuals around the worl...

The Theological Foundation of Democracy According to Ratzinger

When the Cold War was ended in 1989, Francis Fukuyama wrote, three years later, his very well-known book proposing a quite original thesis. He argues that the end of fascism and of communism means the triumph of Easter...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP25962
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9040094
  • Views 349
  • Downloads 10

How To Cite

Enzo Pace (2018). Conclusion. Religions, 9(4), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-25962