Constitutional Control in Georgia and the Right to Consider and Adjudicate upon the Constitutionality of the Decisions of Common (Ordinary) Courts

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2015, Vol 7, Issue 1

Abstract

This article deals with the specialised organ of onstitutional review – the Constitutional Court of Georgia and analyses the possibility of granting the Constitutional Court the right to consider and adjudicate upon the decisions of common (ordinary) courts. The Constitutional Court mainly carries out repressive and abstract control. In general, it considers the constitutionality of normative acts. Most of the constitutional claims apply to compliance of the normative acts with the second chapter of the Constitution of Georgia, which guarantees basic rights and the freedom of individuals. Recently, the Public Defender of Georgia launched an initiative to add to the power of the Constitutional Court to consider the constitutiona lity of the decisions of the courts of last resort. Granting the Constitutional Court this authority is associated with many positive factors. First of all, the Constitutional Court will become the court of last resort in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights and thus, the number of applications against Georgia will be reduced. It will require less financial resources than in case of making application to the European Court of Human rights and the final decision will be adopted in shorter terms. Consequently, the new authority of the Constitutional Court can become a more effective human rights protection mechanism. The new authority may interfere with the common court’s competence; however, finally, the initiative should be positively evaluated.

Authors and Affiliations

Nino Latsabidze

Keywords

Related Articles

Odpowiedzialność za ochronę infrastruktury krytycznej – wybrane aspekty

W artykule zarysowano problematykę ochrony infrastruktury krytycznej na tle wybranych aspektów odpowiedzialności prawnej. Infrastruktura krytyczna stanowi istotny element ciągłości funkcjonowania państwa w wymiarze gospo...

Application of 50% Tax-Deductible Costs to Income Earned from Creative Activity in the Area of Computer Programmes – a Critical Review of New Regulations

Introducing Article 22, section 9b, item 1 into the Personal Income Tax Act of 26 July 1991 using terms that have not been defined in this Act and not specifying the provisions of other acts of law which would become the...

[b]Pro-investment Tax Incentives in Polish Practice[/b]

Economic literature and current economic practice already recognised the need for the state to promote entrepreneurship and especially investment. The most popular method of supporting investment are fiscal subsidies, ta...

Ewolucja lokat OFE w dłużne papiery wartościowe – zagadnienia prawne, finansowe i ekonomiczne

Ostatnia przeprowadzona reforma emerytalna z 2014 r. zdecydowała o kształcie polityki inwestycyjnej otwartych funduszy emerytalnych. Jednym z jej kluczowych elementów była radykalna zmiana limitów lokacyjnych ciążących n...

[b]Enforcement through Compulsory Receivership of the Enterprise[/b]

The compulsory receivership of an enterprise is a form of restriction of entrepreneurship as the debtor is deprived of the right to make business decisions. However this method of enforcement allows the creditor to satis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP79252
  • DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.83
  • Views 114
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nino Latsabidze (2015). Constitutional Control in Georgia and the Right to Consider and Adjudicate upon the Constitutionality of the Decisions of Common (Ordinary) Courts. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 7(1), 229-240. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-79252