COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: COMPARISON AMONG CHINA AND EUROPE

Journal Title: Challenges of the Knowledge Society - Year 2013, Vol 3, Issue 0

Abstract

The impact and creativity has increase in the last years in Europe. It was focused by an United Nations report on creative economy in 2008 .Cooperation and trade in goods and services has increased. Today, the EU is the biggest destination for China's exports and the second supplier to China. For the EU, China is the second trading partner, after the United States. Based on current agreements between the two continents, we can mention the following documents that justify our research: The bilateral issues and cooperation, including people-to-people exchanges in 20111; EU-China Youth Policy Dialogue about education, culture and youth policies;2 The EU-China high level people to people dialogue, celebrated in Chengdu, 2012.3 EU-China Business Summit, which took place in September 2012, in Brussels.4 The EU is committed to strengthening its partnership with China, as demonstrated by the fourteenth EU-China summit that took place in Beijing, 2012.5 Also there are some forums and conferences that are relevant for our research such as, the EU- China high level cultural forum celebrated, in Brussels 2010;6 Beijing in 2011; the Louvre in 2012,7 and the China- EU Seminar on cultural and creative industries cooperation.8 The rights of intellectual property law are more vulnerable in the cultural and creative sector.For this reason, it is essential that we protect ideas and designs; they are the new creations and they need to be sheltered. In this article, we are going to explain what intellectual property (IP) law is, specifically copyright, and how it began to appears in China in order to understand the concept of copyright. To gather this information, we will discuss the copyright protection for creative industries in China. And we will do a brief comparison about the copyright protection for creative industries in EU, including legal mechanisms in EU that relates to China. The methodology is the investigation and examination of documentation and we will elaborate a diagnose to observe the main differences between the Chinese and European legislation. In the end, we will summarize the previous material, and draw a conclusion.

Authors and Affiliations

CRISTINA ORTEGA NUERE, SILVIA MARIA GONZÁLEZ

Keywords

Related Articles

THE ROLE OF THE PRESIDENT OF ROMANIA IN THE GOVERNMENT INVESTITURE PROCEDURE

Nowadays society is very active and susceptible of continuous, rapid changes in all its sectors, and, therefore, the political geography and its actors are also changing at high speed. In such a context, one needs landma...

PAST AND PRESENT IN THE ROMANIAN PRIMARY EDUCATION CURRICULUM

The paper aims at analysing the changes that marked the evolution of both the curriculum frameworks and the syllabi for primary education in Romanian post-communist era, considering the stages of the education reforms st...

SHORT COMMENTARY ON THE RECOMMENDATION CM/REC(2010)1 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES ON THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE PROBATION RULES

The present paper has the purpose to analyze the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the Council of Europe Probation Rules adopted in the 1075th gathering on the 20th of January 2010. This re...

THE RIGHT TO KNOW ONE’S BIOLOGICAL IDENTITY

In the last decade, European Court of Human Right case-law evolution revealed a new component of the right to private life, protected by the Human Rights Convention, Article 8. Existence and limits of the right to know o...

PROFESSIONALIZATION OF THE JUDICIARY BY RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION

Considered as key elements of the human resources policy of an organization, recruitment and selection influence the status of human potential. Given that the main resource of each judicial system is the human resource,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP131518
  • DOI -
  • Views 140
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

CRISTINA ORTEGA NUERE, SILVIA MARIA GONZÁLEZ (2013). COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: COMPARISON AMONG CHINA AND EUROPE. Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 3(0), 759-777. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-131518