CURRENT TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE MEDICINES MARKE

Abstract

Price-gouging in the health care sector has attracted serious public attention and has become highly politicized in many jurisdictions. The ongoing EU Commission‘s probe into excessive pricing practices suggests that, at least in the context of the health care industry, exploitative practices will no longer stay unnoticed. The crafting of an administrative legal text by the Commission, which will enable competition authorities in EU to determine whether a price is “excessive” or practice is “exploitative”, is fraught with difficulties. Moreover, assuming such a regulation could be put through, central and country administrations would then be faced with the equally difficult task of prescribing an adequate remedy. In addition. we don’t see a trend that suggests that pharmaceutical companies are specializing into price increases, it is rather publicists ‘created context that attracts attention. In this context, the authors review current pricing trends for products with competition, and discuss the qualitative portfolio funding decisionmaking model, according to which companies make choices on funding product developments and pursue licensing opportunities. The model focuses on the products’ early business stage, no matter if small or big molecule and regardless from the product’s origin (in-house developed or in-licensed), and addresses issues specific to prior product launches. The authors discuss how this early stage risk assessment proves itself to be successful in supplying the market with more sustainable products. The authors also argue that many therapeutic indications that were once attractive to invest in, are now dangerously saturated with commoditized molecules (1) (albeit not always a superior therapy is available), and that medications’ current market prices, in many cases, are not relevant to the value they provide to the patients. Such devaluation, detached from the value that products bring, and provoked only by price competition, may have negative long-term impact on patients, on the industry and on health care systems. The authors identify and discuss three criteria reflecting a sustainable medicines market from the perspective of payers and manufacturers – fair price levels, healthy competition and modern therapy penetration.

Authors and Affiliations

Todor Finkov, Patryk Izdebski, Petko Salchev

Keywords

Related Articles

SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common debilitating condition worldwide. In the European Union, ischemic heart disease (a type of CVD due to atherosclerosis) remains the most common cause of death, causing approxima...

OCCUPATIONAL RISKS IN AGRICULTURAL WORKERS

Agriculture workers undertake many work situations as traditional crop and livestock production, machinery repair, welding, application of different chemicals and therefore they are at high risk for fatal and nonfatal in...

Nutrition in children 1-5 years of age in Bulgaria - MIcronutrient INTAKE

Nationally representative study of nutrition of children 1-5 years of age is prerequisite for assessment of nutritional status, identification of developmental risk factors and elaboration of nutrition policy. Studies co...

Main aspects OF nutrition IN infants 0-6 months of age in Bulgaria

Infants are risk population group in relation to nutrition, due to their rapid linear growth, accelerated brain development, accelerated development and maturation of immune system, higher prevalence of communicable dise...

PLANNING OF HUMAN RESOURCES IN HEALTHCARE

The definement of the needs for human resources is a problem with strategic importance. The achievement of the aims of an organization depends on its correct solution. Basic aspects, connected to the planning of human re...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP473304
  • DOI -
  • Views 79
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Todor Finkov, Patryk Izdebski, Petko Salchev (2017). CURRENT TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE MEDICINES MARKE. Българско списание за обществено здраве (Bulgarian Journal of Public Health), 0(4), 40-51. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-473304