Danylo Galytskiy and option of civilizational and governmental development of Ukraine during the period of Russ

Journal Title: Eminak - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Attempts of Kyivska Rus history observations are represented in the article on the basis of literature analysis . Article also determines reasons of choice of Galytsko-Volynske principality as a main developer of civilizational and governmental progress on Ukrainian territory in difficult ХІІІth century. The main reason of Ruirikovytch ruling family disintegration was option of own development, legal order and civilizational creation ways. Galytsko-Volynske and Rostovo-Suzdalske principalities became centers of new governmental projects on the ruins of old, powerful, Eastern European empire. Heads of these principalities - Danylo Romanovytch Galytskiy and Olexander Yaroslavovytch Nevskiy determined directions of civilizational development on the controlled areas. Olexander and Danylo had to choose the model of their principalities evolution despite of having external enemies such as Mongols, Hungarians, Polish, Teutons and internal enemies, among them were representatives of local nobles. So that meant that princes had to conduct the correlation of civilizational development option of Russ for the next decades. Such correlation was implemented during Mongolian and Aftermongolian periods. Changes concerned measures of force using to controlled population, subjects who were able to use such force, development of Orthodoxy and sacred and religious reasoning of powers of the prince and other ruling subjects. Innovations were implemented because of consolidated needs of separated areas, centralization of government and capability of Mongolian domination opposition. Moreover, changes were accompanied by the revision of byzantine and religious filling of princely, ruling method, which existed in Russ. Danylo chose eastern type of state and society evolution but Olexander preferred Mongolian centralized autocracy. As a result, peculiar type of state was formed and determined the development of areas for centuries in Galytsko-Volynska Russ and Northeastern principalities in advance. Civilizational choice of Volodymyr-Suzdal principalities leaded to despotic, centralized, horde, byzantine and moscow statehood formation in Northeastern Russ. This type of statehood was supported by orthodox hierarchs, who were coaxed by Mongolian khans, and promoted Mongolian policy and way of ruling. Conversely, Danylo Romanovytch selected eastern method of Slavonic civilization and state progress. Roman Mstyslavovytch and his son Danylo Romanovytch united Southwestern and Southern principalities an gained titles ‘autocrat of all Russ’ and king of Russ from chroniclers. Both princes aimed to become collectors of Russ’s lands and to continue affairs of Ruirikovytch dynasty. Danylo was focused on eastern ruling tradition and attempted to integrate his principality into European civilizational governmental type of development of those times. Family connections of Romanovytch dynasty also facilitated that integration. New legal agreements between prince and local feudal elites and legal traditions of neighbouring European states were implemented and distributed in Galytsko-Volynska Russ. The demand of finding new confederates for struggling against Mongols accelerated prince’s European option. The alliance with prince Andrew Yaroslavovytch failed and his brother Olexander chose horde way of state development. Danylo concentrated on eastern neighbors of Russ and started process of family dynastic marriages consolidation because of not getting support for struggling against hordes from Northeastern Ruirikovytchs. Family dynastic factor further strengthened civilizational governmental option’s direction of Ukraine at the period of Russ and provided an opportunity of cultural and political integration into European civilization of those times.

Authors and Affiliations

Viktor Docenko

Keywords

Related Articles

Legislative and normative definition of tasks and contingent spinning, restraints and workers houses: a comparative analysis (on materials of the Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire)

The article explores the process of formation and development of the legislative framework in the definition of objectives and the terms «clients» spinning, restraints and workers houses on the basis of the analysis of t...

The Khrushchev reforms: liberalization of the political system or an attempt to build a civil society? (the example of Ukrainian SSR)

Khrushchev reforms were directed at leaving the country from the excesses of the Stalin era by reforming the political and socioeconomic system in the country. However, document analysis and study of the situation give r...

The development of scientific methods of research for the railways rolling stock

The article is devoted to the historical-scientific analysis on scientific research development of the railways rolling stock. Experimental studies of the locomotives’ thermo technical and traction qualities played an im...

The Asia-Pacific direction of the Spanish foreign policy under governments of J.M. Aznar (1996-2004)

Spain’s foreign policy towards the Asia-Pacific region is analysed. This paper devoted the efforts by government of J.M. Aznar in order to strengthen role of Spain in region from which it has been largely absent. Despite...

The phenomen of protestant chaplains in a combat zone in the East of Ukraine (based on fund collection the National museum of Ukrainian history)

Article based on fund collection of the National Museum of History of Ukraine. This article analyze the place and role of the church in war in the East of Ukraine during the ATO. It also traces the forms and methods of t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP254039
  • DOI -
  • Views 128
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Viktor Docenko (2017). Danylo Galytskiy and option of civilizational and governmental development of Ukraine during the period of Russ. Eminak, 3(1), 5-10. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-254039