DEATH PENALTY IN INDONESIA: WHAT AND WHY? IS IT NOT AGAINST UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHT PRINCIPLE?

Abstract

Even though Indonesia has ratified International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in 2005 which directly recognizes the right to life, at the same time Indonesia has committed to apply the death penalty in its law system. Strengthened by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia through its verdict, the legality of the death penalty implementation in Indonesia cannot be void, considering the natures of the Court verdict which are final and binding. However, the issue of the death penalty is debatable among society because it is clear that under article 28I paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution to protect its people right to life. Besides, the ineffectiveness justice system in Indonesia also become one of the main grounds for cons groups to propose to the government for abolishing the death penalty as a form of punishment in the Indonesian law system. Aiming to comprehend this issue reasonably, this paper is not only going to explore the grounds of the government of the Republic of Indonesia for promoting and supporting the death penalty as one of real punishment in Indonesia but also explain the details of types crimes in which can be sentenced a death. Under article 6 paragraph (2) of ICCPR, there is a room for a country which has not to abolish the death penalty to sentence a death but only for only the most serious crimes. Thus, Do the type of crimes which can be convicted a death in Indonesia meet the definition of the most serious crimes agreed by international law and the national security interest? If so, Is this policy against the human right to life? This article will expose some scholars’ arguments, cases, jurisprudence, and verdicts to show the standing of the author in this issue.

Authors and Affiliations

Rima Yuwana YUSTIKANINGRUM

Keywords

Related Articles

IMMIGRANTS' ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION IN HOST COUNTRY- FROM PRECONCEIVED IDEAS TO REAL LIFE. CASE STUDY ON THE ROMANIANS'

Reticence towards Romanian migrants is a matter of interest in the analysis of migratory flows in the EU by country of origin. Since Romania's pre-accession to the European Union, among developed countries such as Great...

DEONTOLOGY AND ETHICS –SOME DETAILS ON THE VIOLATIONS OF RULES IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACTIVITY AND THEIR SANCTIONING

This study concentrates on ethics and deontology rules which apply in the scientific research activity and has the aim to outline the main violations encountered in practice and their correlative sanctions. The topic is...

RESOLUTION ON INSURANCE

The insurance activity as a whole is of interest and concern for the state power which, by virtue of the principle of market economy organization, must, on the one hand, intervene in order to provide a favorable framewor...

ELEMENTS CONCERNING THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

Studying collaborative relationships between the public and private sectors concurs to the knowledge of contribution in promote economic development, regeneration of urban and rural areas, through the participation of a...

THE REFRACTION STATE OF THE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT AT A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL

The conceptual and material construction of the present article involves a high degree of originality and conceptual innovation, the ideas stated here are not to be found anywhere in this world as we know it and it repre...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP590933
  • DOI -
  • Views 131
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rima Yuwana YUSTIKANINGRUM (2019). DEATH PENALTY IN INDONESIA: WHAT AND WHY? IS IT NOT AGAINST UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHT PRINCIPLE?. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 11(13), 825-830. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-590933