Decisions in moral dilemmas: The influence of subjective beliefs in outcome probabilities
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2017, Vol 12, Issue 5
Abstract
Previous studies have found that the proportions of people who endorsed utilitarian decisions varied across different variants of the trolley dilemma. In this paper, we explored whether moral choices were associated with beliefs about outcome probabilities in different moral dilemmas. Results of two experiments showed that participants’ perceptions of outcome probabilities were different between two dilemmas that were similar to the classical switch case and footbridge case. Participants’ judgments of the outcome probabilities were associated with their moral choices. The results suggested that participants might not accept task instructions and thus did not perceive the outcomes in the dilemmas as certain. We argued that researchers who endorse descriptive tasks in moral reasoning research should be cautious about the findings and should take participants’ beliefs in the outcomes into account.
Authors and Affiliations
Yiyun Shou and Fei Song
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678309
- DOI -
- Views 150
- Downloads 0
Further evidence for the memory state heuristic: Recognition latency predictions for binary inferences
According to the recognition heuristic (RH), for decision domains where recognition is a valid predictor of a choice criterion, recognition alone is used to make inferences whenever one object is recognized and the other...
Cognition in the woods: Biases in probability judgments by search and rescue planners
A type of emergency decision-making which has not received research attention is the police search for a lost person in a rural or wilderness area. For many such incidents, decisions concerning where to search for the lo...
Choice processes and their post-decisional consequences in morally conflicting decisions
Morally challenging decisions tend to be perceived as difficult by decision makers and often lead to post-decisional worry or regret. To test potential causes of these consequences, we employed realistic, morally challen...
On the meaning and measurement of maximization
Building on Herbert Simon’s critique of rational choice theory, Schwartz et al. (2002) proposed that when making choices, some individuals — maximizers — search extensively through many alternatives with the goal of maki...
The importance of learning when making inferences
The assumption that people possess a repertoire of strategies to solve the inference problems they face has been made repeatedly. The experimental findings of two previous studies on strategy selection are reexamined fro...