Differences in visual information-seeking behavior between expert and novice time-trial cyclists
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
Introduction: Pacing can be defined as an ability to distribute available energy resources during the race (Hettinga et al., 2006). It’s a determinant of athletic performance, affected by an interaction between previous experience, performance feedback and individual risk-traits (Micklewright et al., 2014). Selective processing of internal physiological and external feedback information is a complex process that informs pace decision-making (Renfree et al., 2014), but little is known about how athletes seek-out and interpret information to make pacing decisions. This study compared information-seeking behavior between novice and experienced cyclists. Methods: Novice (n=10) and experienced (n=10) cyclists performed two 16.09 km self-paced time-trials (TT’s), one week apart. Time-trials were performed on a Velotron cycle ergometer using a video simulated course. Performance information (power, speed, cadence, distance and time), heart rate and the 6-20 RPE scale were displayed in front of participants during TT’s. A head-mounted eye-tracker was used to measure the frequency and duration of gazes towards each type of information. Gaze was coded as ‘other’ when participants were not looking at any of the information specified above. Cumulative gaze duration for each information source was calculated as a percentage of TT completion time. Between and within-subjects ANOVA’s were used to compare performance, fixation times and fixation frequencies between groups and trials. Results: Performance between TT’s did not change for experts (27:55±1:21 vs. 27:42±1:30 mins:secs) or novices (30:53±3:14 vs. 30:16±2:56 mins:secs). Cycling speed in each segment was faster among experts compared to novices, but both groups maintained an even pace through the TT’s. In TT1, experts primarily looked at speed (30.1%) followed by other (19.3%) then distance (18.3%). Novices were less selective during TT1, looking at distance (21.6%), video (15.3%), other (14.3%), and power (13.4%) (Fig 1A). Experts looked at speed more in TT2 (Speed 33.4%, Distance 17.7%, and other 16%) and novices looked at the video less (Distance 23.1%, Speed 14.4%, Power 13.8%, Other 13.6% and Video 10.5%) (Fig1B). Differences in fixation time were found between groups for primary (P=0.003) and secondary sources of information (P=0.043) (Fig 2A). Differences were also found in frequency for primary (P=0.003) and secondary source of information (P=0.04) respectively (Fig. 2B). Discussion: Experts were found to look at speed as their primary source of information compared to novices who looked at distance. This may indicate a preference for performance related decision-making in experts compared to a focus on task completion among novices.
Authors and Affiliations
Boya M| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Foulsham T| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Hettinga, F| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Parry D| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Williams EL| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Jones HS| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Sparks SA| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Marchant D| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Ellison P| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Bridge C| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Midgley A| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, McNaughton L| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Micklewright D. | Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2931
- DOI -
- Views 382
- Downloads 21
Numerical simulations of cross wind effects on cyclist aerodynamic resistance
Introduction: In outdoor cycling, cross wind can affect the race strategy and the final results. Ad-hoc strategies, like echelons and Belgian tourniquet formations, are indeed adopted by cyclists to reduce wind effects a...
Evaluation of comfort: Acceleration transmissibility of different road bikes
Cycling training volume is very important for professional cyclists. According to Pinot and Grappe (2014), a top-10 cycling Grand Tour finisher rides ~30,000 km and 950 h during one complete season. In this condition sev...
Application to cycling of a bioenergetic model: Towards a multi-level biomechanical model for global cyclist performance analysis
Introduction: Models of bioenergetic systems are developed to explain how a biological system behaves while interacting with the environment. Recent attempts in sport science research advocate the evidence-based training...
The effect of aerodynamic characteristics on the drafting effect in track cycling
Since the aim of the men’s team pursuit is to accomplish a distance of 4000m as fast as possible, reducing aerodynamic drag by means of drafting can attribute in achieving this goal. Broker et al.1 quantified the average...
Modelling the energy metabolism of best performances in professional cycling
It is widely accepted that the muscular energy metabolism is of primary importance for best performances in professional cycling. However the dynamics of the muscular energy metabolism can neither get accessed directly n...