Digital Computed Tomography Affords New Measurement Possibilities in Lumbar Stenosis

Journal Title: Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja - Year 2009, Vol 11, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction. The problem of lumbar stenosis has been analysed at length in the literature as the number of patients with low back pain of this aetiology continues to increase. The aim of this study was:1. to carry out a prospective study assessing the dimensions of spinal canal on the basis of CT data and to compare patient data with a control group.2. to determine if the sagittal and transverse dimensions and surface area of the spinal canal are sufficiently sensitive and robust measures of spinal canal stenosis at L3, L4 and L5 levels.Material and methods. The investigational group consisted of 176 patients (93 men, 83 women). A total of 528 vertebral levels were evaluated and compared with a control group consisting of 42 persons. Digital CT scans were obtained with a precision of 0.01 mm and 0.01 mm². A discriminative function algorithm was used to classify cases according to the level of stenosis.Results. The mean sagittal dimension at L3 was 13.26 mm and the mean transverse dimension was 23.36 mm, with a surface area of 244.39 mm². At L4, the mean sagittal dimension was 14.12 mm, the mean transverse dimension was 24.60 mm, and the surface area was 267.70 mm². At L5, the mean sagittal dimension was 14.76 mm, the mean transverse dimension was 31.38 mm, and the surface area was 303.99 mm². The most important factors influencing the quality of classification were height, width and surface area. Student’s t test with a significance level at p=0.05 revealed statistically significant differences. The accuracy of classification in discriminative analysis was 92.66%. Conclusions. The proposed indicators of the sagittal and transverse dimensions and surface area of the spinal canal were useful in assessing quantitative changes with this investigational technique. The sagittal dimension had the greatest sensitivity in the evaluation of stenosis.

Authors and Affiliations

Kazimierz Rąpała, Sławomir Chaberek, Aleksandra Truszczyńska, Stanisław Łukawski, Piotr Walczak

Keywords

Related Articles

Zastosowanie litych przeszczepów autogenicznych w rekonstrukcji masywnych ubytków kostnych w pierwotnej endoprotezoplastyce całkowitej kolana

Wstęp. Podejmując się leczenia operacyjnego pacjentów z zaawansowanymi zmianami zwyrodnieniowymi stawów kolanowych możemy być zmuszeni do uzupełnienia masywnych ubytków kostnych. Istnieją systemy protez rewizyjnych, któr...

Leczenie i diagnostyka różnicowa torbieli tętniakowatej kości w oparciu o własne doświadczenia

Wstęp Tętniakowata torbiel kości po raz pierwszy została opisana przez Jaffego i Lichtenteina w 1942 roku. W podanej w 1972 roku przez Schajowicza i wsp. i zmodyfikowanej nastepnie przez WHO (1993 r. ) Klasyfikacji Histo...

Outcomes of hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 28 years old

Background: Osteoarthritis is a serious social problem. Young people usually present with secondary degenerative changes. These patients find it particularly difficult to accept symptoms, as they are at their peak of pr...

Przednia stabilizacja kręgosłupa w skoliozach piersiowo-lędźwiowych

Wstęp. Dobór odpowiedniego typu stabilizacji w leczeniu operacyjnym skolioz piersiowo-lędźwiowych jest nadal dyskutowany.Materiał i metody. W pracy przedstawiono wyniki operacyjnego leczenia 127 pacjentów ze skoliozą pie...

Cementless stem stability in dysplastic arthrosis of the hip – 12 years’ experience

Introduction The aim of this paper is a retrospective assessment of artificial hip joint function and stability of cementless stems of varied design used in the treatment of deformative and degenerative dysplastic change...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP56873
  • DOI -
  • Views 121
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kazimierz Rąpała, Sławomir Chaberek, Aleksandra Truszczyńska, Stanisław Łukawski, Piotr Walczak (2009). Digital Computed Tomography Affords New Measurement Possibilities in Lumbar Stenosis . Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja, 11(1), 14-28. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-56873