Dual processes and moral conflict: Evidence for deontological reasoners’ intuitive utilitarian sensitivity

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2017, Vol 12, Issue 2

Abstract

The prominent dual process model of moral cognition suggests that reasoners intuitively detect that harming others is wrong (deontological System-1 morality) but have to engage in demanding deliberation to realize that harm can be acceptable depending on the consequences (utilitarian System-2 morality). But the nature of the interaction between the processes is not clear. To address this key issue we tested whether deontological reasoners also intuitively grasp the utilitarian dimensions of classic moral dilemmas. In three studies subjects solved moral dilemmas in which utilitarian and deontological considerations cued conflicting or non-conflicting decisions while performing a demanding concurrent load task. Results show that reasoners’ sensitivity to conflicting moral perspectives, as reflected in decreased decision confidence and increased experienced processing difficulty, was unaffected by cognitive load. We discuss how these findings argue for a hybrid dual process model interpretation in which System-1 cues both a deontological and utilitarian intuition.

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Białek and Wim De Neys

Keywords

Related Articles

Bayesian analysis of deterministic and stochastic prisoner’s dilemma games

This paper compares the behavior of individuals playing a classic two-person deterministic prisoner’s dilemma (PD) game with choice data obtained from repeated interdependent security prisoner’s dilemma games with varyin...

Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency

The illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of succe...

A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation

Taxation policy is driven by many factors, including public opinion, but little research has examined the strength and stability of the public’s taxation preferences. This paper demonstrates one way in which preferences...

Disentangling the effects of alternation rate and maximum run length on judgments of randomness

Binary sequences are characterized by various features. Two of these characteristics—alternation rate and run length—have repeatedly been shown to influence judgments of randomness. The two characteristics, however, have...

Does telling white lies signal pro-social preferences?

The opportunity to tell a white lie (i.e., a lie that benefits another person) generates a moral conflict between two opposite moral dictates, one pushing towards telling the truth always and the other pushing towards he...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678284
  • DOI -
  • Views 152
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Białek and Wim De Neys (2017). Dual processes and moral conflict: Evidence for deontological reasoners’ intuitive utilitarian sensitivity. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(2), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678284