Effect of milking frequency and lactation length on yield and milk composition in goats

Journal Title: Agricultural Advances - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 12

Abstract

The level of individual milk output per dam is a crucial element in the economic survival of any dairy enterprise. A profitable goat dairy enterprise should aim at maximazation of milk output per dam or optimizing the overall milk output from the flock. The present discussion explores the potential use of milking frequency as a management tool available for goat dairy farmers in manipulation of milk yield per dam and its implication for mammary functioning and its influence in enhancing metabolic activities in milk secrection. The influence of lactation length on yield and milk composition is also discussed. Lactation length and milking frequency are some of factors which have been implicated in influencing yield and milk composition. Different milking frequencies in different management systems have been studied with different results observed in their influences on yield and milk composition. There are different adaptive responses of the mammary gland of different animal species to extended milking frequencies and lactation length in different systems of management. The lactation length records can facilitate the allocation of resources such as feed supplies both for individual doe and the flock. From the discussion milking frequency and lactation length account for some of the variation in milk yield and composition, therefore adjustment of dairy records for lactation length is essential for accurate selection of dairy animals in a flock. The feature of once daily milking is that it reduces milk yield, depending on stage of lactation, breed and parity. However, with the labour costs being recognized as one of the highest contributors to a dairy enterprise daily expenses, it is suffice to suggest that the cost implications related to once daily milking can not be ignored. In goats milked twice daily, but increasing milking frequency to three times a day or even more often increases goat milk yield.

Authors and Affiliations

N. Assan| Zimbabwe Open University, Department of Agriculture Management, Faculty of Science, Bulawayo Region, Box 3550, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.

Keywords

Related Articles

Recent technologies for dairy products packaging

In modern times packaging has been identified as an integral part of processing in the dairy industry. Package is the gateway to know a product and is brand ambassador of a product. It serves as a vital link in the lon...

Effect of planting geometry on yield and yield attributes of aromatic rice genotypes

To evaluate the effects of plant spacing on the growth and yield of aromatic rice varieties, a field experiment was carried out at the Agronomy Filed Laboratory, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Banglade...

Kinetics of biogas production from jackfruit wastes co-digested with cow paunch in batch mode

Application of appropriate mathematical models is one of the strategies in solving the stability problems often exhibited by anaerobic digestion process. Kinetics of batch anaerobic digestion of jackfruit waste co-dige...

Effect of different intercropping systems on soil moisture conservation, fruit yield and quality of Nagpur mandarin (Cit

A field experiment was conducted during 2009-2012 to study the integrated field crop based intercropping systems with cotton as main and other field crops (black gram, soyabean, groundnut, gram and mungbean) as interm...

Histomorphological studies of the prenatal development of oesophagus of one humped camel (camelus dromedarius)

A Histomorphological study was conducted on the oesophagus of 35 foetuses of the one-humped camel collected from the Sokoto metropolitan abattoir, over a period of five months at different gestational ages. The approxi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP565
  • DOI 10.14196/aa.v3i12.1776
  • Views 570
  • Downloads 22

How To Cite

N. Assan (2014). Effect of milking frequency and lactation length on yield and milk composition in goats. Agricultural Advances, 3(12), 292-299. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-565