Effectiveness of Judicial Review in the Polish Competition Law System and the Place for Judicial Deference
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 14
Abstract
The article discusses the effectiveness and the intensity of judicial review in the Polish competition law system. First, it studies whether the judicial review offered by the 1st instance Court of Competition and Consumer Protection in Warsaw (SOKiK) is effective in practice. Next, the article analyzes whether Polish courts tend to defer to the findings of the Polish competition authority, UOKiK. Judgments of the Supreme Court concerning relevant market definition serve as case studies. Finally, the article discusses whether proceedings before the Polish competition authority ensure sufficient due process guarantees, the impartiality of decisionmakers, and the overall expert character of UOKiK’s decision-making process. On this basis the article examines whether there are grounds for the reviewing courts to defer to UOKiK’s findings. The article concludes that currently the review undertaken by SOKiK happens to be superficial and thus ineffective. At the same time, the Supreme Court’s review of the determination of the relevant market is not deferential towards UOKiK’s findings. The Supreme Court substitutes its own definition of the relevant market for that of UOKiK and that of the lower courts. However, the article shows that there are no grounds at the moment for arguing for greater judicial deference. Proceedings held before UOKiK, despite recently introduced improvements, still do not offer sufficient due process guarantees or a division between investigatory and decision-making functions. In addition, UOKiK’s expertise is not sufficient for both institutional and practical reasons.
Authors and Affiliations
Maciej Bernatt
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP319983
- DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.4
- Views 42
- Downloads 0
2016 Amendment of the Czech Significant Market Power Act of 2009
he Significant Market Power Act (SMPA) adopted in 2009 regulates the assessment of, and the prevention of, the abuse of market power in the sale of agricultural and food products. The Act...
Joint and Several Liability of Competition Law Infringers in the Legislation of Central and Eastern European Member States
The study reviews the provisions of the Directive by, first, presenting its general rule – joint and several liability – and then its two exceptions, pointing out that albeit they contain similar solutions, these have di...
(Why) Did EU Net Neutrality Rules Overshoot the ark? Internet, Disruptive Innovation and EU Competition Law & Policy
This essay raises a number of theses in support for a more liberalised approach to EU Net Neutrality rules. It offers a graded system of levels of regulatory intervention, arguing that soft Net Neutrality rules are capab...
Substantive and Procedural Issues of Cement Sector Investigations in Turkey
In 2016, the Turkish Competition Authority (hereinafter, TCA) published the Cement Sector Inquiry Report (hereinafter, Cement Sector Report) following more than two years of market analysis. One of the reasons...
Piotr Semeniuk, Koncepcja jednego organizmu gospodarczego w prawie ochrony konkurencji [The Concept of a Single Economic Unit in Competition Law], University of Warsaw Faculty of Management Press, Warsaw 2015, 325 p. (book review)
The book under review here provides a very broad analysis of the concept of a single economic unit. The analysis refers either to many aspects of substantive rules of competition law (among them, the a...