Europejski model nadzoru finansowego – kierunki rozwoju

Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2016, Vol 49, Issue 1

Abstract

The complexity and uncertainty in the application of the European system of financial supervision is due to the fact that its particular concepts were implemented at different times. First, it was the system of European financial supervisors (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA), which was primarily aimed at coordination of national activities. Then, the European Banking Union was established, comprised of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), and the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), as well as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) which must also be seen in the context of assistance to troubled banks. Difficulties of interpretation are further compounded by a lack of consistency in approach to the institutions subject to examination. Should they include only the euro zone, or the whole EU, only the banks or other institutions as well? If you take into account the SSM, SRM or ESM, it is often not very clear who and when should act what tools should be applied, For example, when the ECB may, and should, correct decisions of national su‑ pervisors and what, in the context of increasing involvement of the ECB in the banking union, is the role of the ESRB; whether and when banks can possibly challenge deci‑ sions eg. on establishing a capital buffer or inclusion on the SIFI list, etc. Also unclear is the role of the EBA and ESMA in the context of the creation of a banking union, SSM, SRM and ESM and delegation of regulatory powers of ECB and the Commission to regulatory agencies (Meroni doctrine) or creation of regulatory agencies beyond the Treaty (Pringle doctrine).

Authors and Affiliations

Włodzimierz Szpringer

Keywords

Related Articles

Ocena uzasadnionego wniosku, zgodnie z art. 7 Traktatu o Unii Europejskiej, dotyczącego praworządności w Polsce, wraz z projektem decyzji Rady w sprawie stwierdzenia wyraźnego ryzyka poważnego naruszenia przez Rzeczpospolitą Polską zasady praworządności

Having assessed the EU documents, the author states that the proposed decision does not have social, economic or financial consequences. When as­sessing documents legally, the author states that the recommendations and t...

Opinia prawna na temat niektórych skutków projektowanej nowelizacji przepisów art. 156 i 158 Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego

In the author’s opinion the amendment would result, inter alia, in adapting the provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure relating to the declaration of invalidity of administrative decisions to the principles e...

Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 105 ust. 1 Konstytucji oraz art. 7b–8 w związku z art. 6 i 6a ustawy o wykonywaniu mandatu posła i senatora

A Deputy, after the expiry of the mandate, is still entitled to legal protection based on art. 105 paragraph 1 sentence 2 of the Constitution. This means that even after the expiry of the mandate, the Deputy may be prose...

Propozycja nowelizacji art. 133 Kodeksu karnego

The draft amendment, which is the subject of the reviewed petition, contains an introduction to the indicated provision of the Criminal Code of a new type of a punishable act – the use of terms: Polish death camps, Polis...

Opinia na temat zawartych w Partnerstwie Transpacyficznym (Trans-Pacific Partnership) postanowień dotyczących zabezpieczenia rynku przed produktami genetycznie modyfikowanym

Article 2.27 of Trans-Pacific Partnership (PTP) agreement, concerning the trade of products of modern biotechnology, cannot be interpreted in a way which would impose upon any of the Parties an obligation to adopt or ame...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP309745
  • DOI -
  • Views 54
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Włodzimierz Szpringer (2016). Europejski model nadzoru finansowego – kierunki rozwoju. Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 49(1), 9-43. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-309745