Evaluating the Time Interval between Calling Emergency Medical Services and Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Journal Title: مجله طب اورژانس ایران - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the intervention of choice for treating patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). This study was done aiming to measure the time interval between the patient calling emergency medical services (EMS) to performance of primary angioplasty on patients with acute MI. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was carried out on patients brought to emergency department (ED) by EMS who complained from cardiac chest pain and underwent primary PCI. Data regarding age, sex, and various time intervals from the moment the patient calls emergency medical service until performing primary PCI, which were accurately recorded in their medical profile, were gathered in a pre-designed checklist and analyzed. Results: Data of 121 patients with the mean age of 58.36 ± 12.09 years was assessed (77.68% male). Mean time interval between calling EMS and undergoing primary PCI was 145.84 ± 62.37 minutes. Mean time interval between arriving at triage and primary PCI (door to balloon time) was 104.61 ± 62.37 minutes. The biggest part (32%) belonging to the time interval between diagnosis of acute MI and dislocation of patient to the angiography unit. The difference between door to balloon time in this study and the standard 90-minutes time was 14.61 minutes (minimum 3.38; maximum 25.83), which is significant (p = 0.011). Conclusion: Although in the present study, most patients underwent primary PCI in less than 3 hours of calling EMS following chest pain, comparing the overall door to balloon time in the present study with the 90minute standard showed a significant difference. With EMS staff obtaining the patient’s electrocardiogram on the scene and confirming MI diagnosis before reaching the hospital, the patient can be directly delivered to angiography unit and the door to balloon time can be reduced by about 57%.

Authors and Affiliations

Keywords

Related Articles

Cause of Death in Emergency Department; a Brief Report

Introduction: This epidemiologic study was aimed to identify the causes of death in the emergency department of Imam Khomeini hospital in Urmia, Iran. Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out on the profiles o...

Evaluating Knowledge and Performance of Emergency Medical Services Staff Regarding Pre-Hospital Triage

Introduction: One of the important indices of preparedness for accidents and disasters is evaluation of knowledge and performance of emergency medical services (EMS) staff regarding principles of triage. Therefore, the p...

Cause and Final Outcome of Trauma in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department; a Cross Sectional Study

Introduction: Today trauma is considered as the first cause of death and disability of active population in developed and developing countries. Using preventive procedures in trauma events are effective when acute inform...

The Agreement of Shock Index and Base Defects in Determining the Severity of Shock in Multiple Trauma Patients

Introduction: Although using clinical scales to predict shock severity is interesting for physicians asthey provide rapid evaluation without need for special equipment, they are not highly reliableTherefore, the present...

Establishing a Field Hospital; a Report on a Disaster Maneuver

Numerous disasters such as earthquake, flood, tsunami, and war bring about broad crises that cause numerous physical, mental and psychological damages. Iran is also prone to various disasters and needs to be equipped for...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP358527
  • DOI -
  • Views 147
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

(2017). Evaluating the Time Interval between Calling Emergency Medical Services and Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. مجله طب اورژانس ایران, 4(3), 118-124. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-358527