Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC, composite DRASTIC, and nitrate vulnerability models

Journal Title: Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal - Year 2021, Vol 8, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Groundwater protection against pollution is a very important issue. Groundwater vulnerability maps are useful tools for protecting aquifers and assessing the potential for contamination. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to prepare vulnerability maps and perform sensitivity analysis to identify the most influential factors in the vulnerability of the studied aquifer. Methods: In this study, groundwater vulnerability to pollution was evaluated using DRASTIC, composite DRASTIC, and nitrate vulnerability (NV) models. Drastic is an index for the systematic assessment of potential groundwater pollution. In this method, the drastic index was calculated from the total weight and rank of the factors. For this purpose, first the factors affecting the pollution transfer, were weighted, ranked, and merged using GIS software. Then, using the overlapping techniques and after applying the necessary weight coefficients on each layer, a map of the vulnerability area of the study aquifer was prepared. Results: It was revealed that there is a significant linear relationship between all three models with the distribution of nitrate concentration. Accordingly, it was the most efficient NV model, followed by the composite DRASTIC (CD) and DRASTIC models, respectively. Also, in the studied aquifer, the DRASTIC index was between 147 and 136, the combined DRASTIC index was between 70 and 190, and the nitrate index was between 13 and 132. Conclusion: Vulnerability assessment of the studied aquifer using DRASTIC, and combined DRASTIC, and NV indices shows that, according to the DRASTIC index, 69.7% of the studied aquifer was in the medium vulnerability class. Also, according to the combined DRASTIC index, the largest area (53.62%) has low vulnerability and 31.56% has moderate vulnerability. But according to the nitrate index, 77.16% of the aquifers had very low vulnerability.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohsen Pourkhosravani, Fatemeh Jamshidi , Nasrin Sayari

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of bioaerosols, PM2.5, and PM10 in liver transplantation operating rooms in Tehran, Iran: Implications for air quality

Background: Research on the relationship between bioaerosols and particulate matter (PM) concentrations is necessary, especially in hospitals where airborne bioaerosols can facilitate disease transmission. This study a...

Feasibility of natural wastewater treatment systems and life cycle assessment (LCA) for aquatic systems

Background: Natural wastewater treatment systems (NWTSs) in small villages are a major challenge for European water authorities. With growing social demands for environmental practices, evaluating the feasibility and e...

Drinking water resources criteria in emergencies and disasters: A systematic literature review

Background: Disasters occur unexpectedly each year, killing thousands around the world. Millions are directly under the influence of the outcomes of these events and their survival depends on the immediate state and inte...

Estimating greenhouse gas emissions using emission factors from the Sugarcane Development Company, Ahvaz, Iran

Background: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are increasing worldwide. They have harmful effects on human health, animals, and plants and play a major role in global warming and acid rain. Methods: This research investiga...

Enhanced electro-Fenton processes by persulfate radical for atenolol oxidation from aqueous solution

Background: Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) are a group of emerging environmental pollutants that have attracted the attention of many researchers due to their harmful effects on aquatic environment, a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP695566
  • DOI -
  • Views 125
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohsen Pourkhosravani, Fatemeh Jamshidi, Nasrin Sayari (2021). Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC, composite DRASTIC, and nitrate vulnerability models. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 8(2), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-695566