Functional evaluation of management modalities of three and four part proximal humeral fractures

Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Three and four –part fractures represent 13%-16% of proximal humeral fractures. They occur more frequently in older patients after the cancellous bone has become weakened by senility and osteopenia. Treatment options for these displaced fractures include closed reduction and k-wire fixation, open reduction and internal fixation and arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the functional results in patient with three and four-part proximal humeral fractures treated by different modalities, over a period of 2 years. Materials and Methods: We present a retrospective study of 40 three-part and four part proximal humeral fractures according to Neer’s classification, treated by simple technique of Kirschner wire Osteosynthesis, open reduction and internal fixation with clover-leaf plate or proximal humeral locking plate system (PHILOS) and hemiarthroplasty of the proximal humerus. The criteria for inclusion were a diagnosis of undisplaced three-part fracture, displaced three and four part fractures confirmed by three independent observers. Results: The study was conducted over a period of two years with an average follow up of 20.7 months (Range: 12 to 40 months). There were 14 undisplaced three-part fractures impacted in valgus, seven displaced three part fractures, two three-part fracture with dislocated head, four four-part fractures with dislocated head. Conclusion: Three-and four-part proximal humeral fractures are difficult injuries to evaluate and treat. Nevertheless, an algorithm for treatment has been devised. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation must address fracture pattern, bone quality, patient motivation, and expectations. A thorough knowledge of normal glenohumeral relationships is essential to achieve optimal surgical results.

Authors and Affiliations

Rahul Gopikishan Jaju, Ansari Muqtadeer Abdul Aziz, Girish Gadekar

Keywords

Related Articles

Mid-term results of high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment arthritis using hemicallostasis by dynamic external fixator

Introduction: Medial Gonarthrosis of Knee in middle-aged (40-60yrs) physically active individuals has become a considerable cause for pain, immobility and disability. Varus malalignment at knee joint compromises biomecha...

Pre-operative group and save for elective total knee Arthroplasty: Is it indicated?

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed surgical procedure in UK. Routine use of tourniquets and tranexamic acid raises the question of whether pre-operative group and save (G&S) is necessary. M...

A modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique to decrease the incidence of postoperative radiculopathy: A prospective analysis of 216 patients

Reported incidence of postoperative intractable radiculopathy following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbr interbody fusion (TLIF) is between 7-14% affecting postoperative recovery. Excessi...

Rapid diagnosis of “Fatigue” stress fractures using bone scintigraphy: A practical approach

Stress fractures can broadly classified into “fatigue” or “insufficiency” fractures depending on baseline bone health and amount of physical activity. Of these fatigue stress fractures present with a classical history of...

Midterm follow-up study of metal on metal total hip replacement

Background: Metallosis and pseudotumors are long discussed complications with metal on metal bearing total hip replacement which has increased the rate of revision total hip replacements in these patients. Aims and Objec...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP485905
  • DOI 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i1o.145
  • Views 124
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rahul Gopikishan Jaju, Ansari Muqtadeer Abdul Aziz, Girish Gadekar (2018). Functional evaluation of management modalities of three and four part proximal humeral fractures. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 4(1), 1018-1024. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-485905