Funkcja sygnalizacyjna Trybunału Konstytucyjnego — stan obecny a projektowane zmiany. Polemika z Anną Pazurą i Janem Uniejewskim
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2016, Vol 136, Issue 5
Abstract
The article is a polemic. It contains arguments justifying the thesis that the signaling decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal have no effect, either on law-making process or on the application of law. Consequently, a view has developed in the sciences of law that there is need to enhance that instrument. Another view is taken by the author who is in favor of its abolition, rather than strengthening.
Authors and Affiliations
Dorota Lis-Staranowicz
Mitteleuropa revisited. Warum Europas Zukunft in Mitteleuropa entschieden wird (Emil Brix, Erhard Busek)
The book discusses significant issues of Central Europe’s place in the changing geopolitical and economic reality of our continent. Contained therein are diagnoses and prognoses of a possible development, based on the pr...
W sprawie niektórych aspektów zastosowania zasady dyskontynuacji (1)
brak
Aksjologia Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku. Perspektywa badacza myśli politycznej
By pointing to the two meanings of the term “constitutionalism”, the author attempts to derive axiological context from “political morality” which precedes the content of the basic law. He concludes that it can only be d...
Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 25 maja 2016 r. (sygn. akt Kp 2/15)
The commentary refers to the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 25 May 2016 (ref. no. Kp 2/15), in which the Tribunal decided that Article 1 para. 6 and Article 1 para. 20 subpara. b of the Act of 10 July 2015, i...
Rola państwowej własności korporacyjnej — pomiędzy budowaniem wartości spółek a odpowiedzialnym rozwojem
State-owned enterprises are subject to numerous analyses around the world. In many studies, they had been assessed critically. Nevertheless, the state remains the owner of companies in many countries, in particular in st...