Gross efficiency and cycling performance: a brief review
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2012, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
Efficiency, the ratio of work generated to the total metabolic energy cost, has been suggested to be a key determinant of endurance cycling performance. The purpose of this brief review is to evaluate the influence of gross efficiency on cycling power output and to consider whether or not gross efficiency can be modified. In a re-analysis of data from five separate studies, variation in gross efficiency explained ~30% of the variation in power output during cycling time-trials. Whilst other variables, notably VO2max and lactate threshold, have been shown to explain more of the variance in cycling power output, these results confirm the important influence of gross efficiency. Case study, cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention research designs have all been used to demonstrate that exercise training can enhance gross efficiency. Whilst improvements have been seen with a wide range of training types (endurance, strength, altitude), it would appear that high intensity training is the most potent stimulus for changes in gross efficiency. In addition to physiological adaptations, gross efficiency might also be improved through biomechanical adaptations. However, ‘intuitive’ technique and equipment adjustments may not always be effective. For example, whilst ‘pedalling in circles’ allows pedalling to become mechanically more effective, this technique does not result in short term improvements in gross efficiency.
Authors and Affiliations
Simon A Jobson*| Department of Sports Studies, University of Winchester, Hampshire, England., James G Hopker| Centre for Sports Studies, University of Kent, Kent, England., Thomas Korff| School of Sport and Education, Brunel University, Middlesex, England., Louis Passfield| Centre for Sports Studies, University of Kent, Kent, England.
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2799
- DOI -
- Views 602
- Downloads 29
Effect of feedback on cycling performance in a 4‐kilometres laboratory time trial
Background: Nowadays performance data (e.g. power, speed, cadence) are available to cyclists in real time. The availability and manipulation of the data can be used to change activity parameters (e.g. pedaling dynamics)...
Track tales: A narrative exploration of within-career transition in sprint cycling
Background: Although a considerable amount of literature is dedicated to the final transition of retirement, relatively little research focuses on within-career transition. Such a dearth of research may originate from th...
Validity of the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer and Reliability of a 4 km Cycle Time Trial
Purpose: To assess the validity of power and the reliability of a 4 km cycle time trial (TT) using the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer. Methods: The Wahoo KICKR power output was assessed using a dynamic calibration rig (DCR...
Preliminary study: the effect of biomechanical foot orthotics in bilateral pedalling asymmetry in three cyclists affected by an anatomic asymmetry
The optimization of the cyclist's position aims to increase performance and may prevent injuries. To find the optimum posture, taking into account anthropometry of the cyclist is essential [1] because an anatomic asymmet...
Bike fitting: finding an optimum between performance and overuse injuries prevention? Influence of saddle fore-aft position on knee joint forces
The Union Cyclist International (UCI) regulates saddle setback - ‘ the tip of the saddle shall be a minimum of 5 cm to the rear of a vertical plane passing through the crank axis but no maximum is recommended’ - while t...