How bookies make your money

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2

Abstract

UK bookies (bookmakers) herd geographically in less-affluent areas. The present work shows that UK bookies also herd with the special bets that they advertise to consumers, both in their shop window advertising and on TV adverts as shown to millions of viewers. I report an observational study of betting adverts over the 2014 soccer World Cup. Bet types vary in complexity, with complex types having the highest expected losses. Bookies herded on a common strategy of advertising special bets on two levels: by almost exclusively advertising complex bet types with high expected losses, and by advertising representative events within a given complex bet type. This evidence is most consistent with bookies’ advertising targeting a representativeness heuristic amongst bettors. Bookies may know how to nudge bettors toward larger losses.

Authors and Affiliations

Philip W. S. Newall

Keywords

Related Articles

What have I just done? Anchoring, self-knowledge, and judgments of recent behavior

Can numerical anchors influence people’s judgments of their own recent behavior? We investigate this question in a series of six studies. In Study 1, subjects’ judgments of how many anagrams they were given assimilated t...

Different heuristics and same bias: A spectral analysis of biased judgments and individual decision rules

We used correlation and spectral analyses to investigate the cognitive structures and processes producing biased judgments. We used 5 different sets of driving problems to exemplify problems that trigger biases, specific...

Better is worse, worse is better: Reexamination of violations of dominance in intertemporal choice

Recently, Scholten and Read (2014) found new violations of dominance in intertemporal choice. Although adding a small receipt before a delayed payment or adding a small delayed receipt after an immediate receipt makes th...

"If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide

Most people are caring and will exert great effort to rescue individual victims whose needy plight comes to their attention. These same good people, however, often become numbly indifferent to the plight of individuals w...

Numeracy predicts preference consistency: Deliberative search heuristics increase choice consistency for choices from description and experience

Many people exhibit inconsistent preferences when they make choices based on descriptive summaries as compared to choices based on prior experiences. Theoretically, factors that promote more deliberative and skilled deci...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678176
  • DOI -
  • Views 158
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Philip W. S. Newall (2015). How bookies make your money. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678176