How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 5

Abstract

In recent years, numerous studies comparing intuition and deliberation have been published. However, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying the two decision modes. In two studies, we analyzed the effects of decision mode instructions on processes of information search and integration, using eye-tracking technology in a between-participants (Study 1) and a within-participants (Study 2) design. Our findings indicate that the instruction to deliberate does not necessarily lead to qualitatively different information processing compared to the instruction to decide intuitively. We found no difference in mean fixation duration and the distribution of short, medium and long fixations. Short fixations in particular prevailed under both decision mode instructions, while long fixations indicating a conscious and calculation-based information processing were rarely observed. Instruction-induced deliberation led to a higher number of fixations, a more complete information search and more repeated information inspections. We interpret our findings as support for the hypothesis that intuitive and deliberate decision modes share the same basic processes which are supplemented by additional operations in the deliberate decision mode.

Authors and Affiliations

Nina Horstmann, Andrea Ahlgrimm and Andreas Glöckner

Keywords

Related Articles

Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency

The illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of succe...

The impact of excess choice on deferment of decisions to volunteer

Excess choice has previously been shown to have detrimental effects on decisions about consumer products. As the number of options increases, people are more likely to put off making an active choice (i.e., defer) and sh...

Wronging past rights: The sunk cost bias distorts moral judgment

When people have invested resources into an endeavor, they typically persist in it, even when it becomes obvious that it will fail. Here we show this bias extends to people’s moral decision-making. Across two preregister...

Strategies using recent feedback lead to matching or maximising behaviours

One challenge facing humans (and nonhuman animal) is that some options that appear attractive locally may not turn out best in the long run. To analyse this human learning problem, we explore human performance in a dynam...

A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory

Combining meaning, memory, and development, the perennially popular topic of intuition can be approached in a new way. Fuzzy-trace theory integrates these topics by distinguishing between meaning-based gist representatio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677691
  • DOI -
  • Views 176
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nina Horstmann, Andrea Ahlgrimm and Andreas Glöckner (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677691