How well do students in secondary school understand temporal development of dynamical systems?
Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 2
Abstract
Despite difficulties understanding the dynamics of complex systems only simple dynamical systems without feedback connections have been taught in secondary school physics. Consequently, students do not have opportunities to develop intuition of temporal development of systems, whose dynamics are conditioned by the influence of feedback processes. We present a research study on students' understanding of temporal development of simple dynamical systems. Students participating in the study were attending the final two years of a technical secondary school (gimnazija) program. Based on written equations for the rate of change of some quantity students had to qualitatively determine dynamical development. The study confirmed the initial hypotheses with regard to poor knowledge in the area of dynamical systems, irrelevant of year in secondary school or final grade in physics or mathematics. The results showed that most students understood the development of linear systems without feedback and based on equations, students were able to forecast the dynamical development of changing quantities. Issues arose in understanding systems with feedback connections that influence the nonlinear dynamical development of changing quantity. Especially with negative feedback connections that provide stabilization of changing quantities. The reason could be that in most of the cases they turned towards linear dynamical development of changing quantities. Frequently, they incorrectly concluded that the temporal development of changing quantities is the same to temporal development of current, which determines the state of quantity. As a response in overcoming such issues, we recommend a geometrical consideration of one-dimensional dynamical systems.
Authors and Affiliations
Matej Forjan| School Centre Novo mesto, Šegova ulica 112, SI-8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Šegova ulica 112, SI-8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia, For correspondence: matej.forjan@siol.net, Vladimir Grubelnik| University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Smetanova ulica 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP8064
- DOI -
- Views 489
- Downloads 102
Pre-service primary teachers' argumentation in socioscientific issues
Even in the context of a university science course, students make and attempt to defend unscientific claims in personal and scientific contexts. This research examined a random sample of rhetorical arguments submitted by...
The role physics can play in a multi-disciplinary curriculum for non-physics scientists and engineers
At many physics departments a significant fraction of teaching is in support of engineers and scientists in other majors. These service courses are thus an automatic crucible of interdisciplinary interaction, and at time...
Introducing new material for a standardized exam: a controlled, prospective, double-blinded test of student learning
Do multiple choice unit tests reflect what students have learned during the unit? The day before the administration of a county?mandated multiple choice test, two classes were shown a topic they had not previously seen,...
Gender and achievement in English language arts, science and mathematics in secondary schools in Nigeria
The education of girls and women in the areas of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) has long been thought of as very crucial for national development. This study investigated whether gender differenc...
Why do chemistry students need to take mathematics courses?
Students tend to ask why they should learn mathematics lessons or courses. This study investigates the perceptions of chemistry students and their instructors about the relevance of mathematics courses to their field of...