Human papilloma virus status in cervical cancer predictive and prognostic significance for chemo radiation treatment

Journal Title: Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 4

Abstract

Aim: To find out the prevalence of HPV infection and genotypes in invasive cervical cancer patients.To know the predictive and prognostic significance of HPV infection to chemo radiation. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in the department of radiation oncology in Patients attending to O.P.D during the period of one year are included in this study. A total of 145 women age of 30-70 years who were histopathologically proven for cervical cancer. All the patients were given radiotherapy. Results: For HPV detection exfoliated cells were taken by direct scrapings with cervix brush from the cervical tumour before treatment and preserved in preservCyt bottles. The DNP was extracted and was subjected to PCR by using established primers. HPV DNA was detected in 143 (98.6%) of the patients. Median age of the patients was 50 years. Most of the cases were in stage II disease (65.5%). Around 28 different HPV genotypes were found.HPV 16 is the most common genotype (77.6%).34.2% of patients were having multiple genotypes.HPV 33, 35, 52, and 58 were found as multiple genotypes and were not found in singles. Patients were followed up after chemo radiation. Mean follow up was 9.6 months and median follow up was 12 months. Only 82 patients remained for follow up at 12 months and the remaining patients did not turn up for follow up. At the end of 12 months, 57 (69.7%) patients were disease free, 11 (13.4 %) were with residual disease, and 14 (17.7%) were having recurrences. 20 patients were tested for HPV DNA post treatment; HPV DNA was cleared in 20% of patients, and was prevalent in 80% of patients in the study.20% of patients were having persistent HPV 16 genotype. All the patients with multiple genotypes prior treatment were found with single genotype post treatment.20% of patients were found to have different genotypes post treatment when compared to pretreatment.Conclusion: HPV 16 did not show any significance in disease response. 80% of patients had persistent HPV DNA post treatment.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. M. Adi Lakshmi

Keywords

Related Articles

Metanil yellow: The toxic food colorant

Metanil yellow is a food colorant used extensively in various foods. It is also used as an adulterant in different spices especially turmeric and regular Indian foods like pulses. Metanil yellow belongs to “non‑permitted...

Test requisition form- A check point in pre-analytical phase for laboratory errors

Introduction: Quality in clinical laboratories cannot be understood by merely focusing on analytical aspects only; there is a need to put attention on pre-analytical and post-analytical aspects of laboratory testing to i...

Design and development of chronomodulated pulsincap delivery system of deflazacort

Aim of the present study was to formulate, evaluate and optimize the Pulsincap delivery system of deflazacort used in rheumatoid arthritis, based on the chronotherapeutic approach. The prepared pulsincap system consist o...

Treatment of Acute Apical Abscess by Endodontic Management

Acute apical abscess is most common dental disease. It is formed when the infection from root canal travel to the periapical tissues followed by the formation of pus. A clinician must have a thorough idea about the manag...

Occupational health hazards among mortuary attendants at ndola teaching and arthur davison children’s hospitals

Background: Just like employees from other occupations, Mortuary attendants are exposed to various hazards that may put their health at risk as they perform their duties. Objectives: The study was aimed at identifying oc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP525218
  • DOI 10.21276/apjhs.2016.3.4.30
  • Views 150
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. M. Adi Lakshmi (2016). Human papilloma virus status in cervical cancer predictive and prognostic significance for chemo radiation treatment. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 3(4), 189-198. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-525218