Introducing a Dental Caries Marking Software and Evaluate Radiologists’ Disagreement in Caries Detection Using this Software

Journal Title: Journal of Dental Biomaterials - Year 2015, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Statement of Problem: Bitewing radiograph is the main reference for diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries. There is no software for gathering and analyzing radiologists’ opinion in the field of caries detection on digital bitewing radiograph (DBR). Objectives: The main aim of this study is to introduce the first windows application that could be used for marking caries on DBR. This software is called Dental Caries Marking Software (DCMS). The second aim is to create the first DBR caries dataset to be used for future software development projects in the field of automatic caries detection; also gathering and documenting the disagreements and critiques regarding DCMS. Materials and Methods: DCMS has been designed and implemented by the researchers of this study. This software is divided into two parts. The first part is DCMS writer that is used for gathering the user’s opinion and The second part is DCMS analyzer that is used for reading and analyzing the user’s opinion file. Eight radiologists with different experiences used DCMS for marking dental caries on 200 DBR, 50 of which were repeated twice for assessing the accuracy of each radiologist. Results: A total of 3833 points were marked by 8 users on 150 non repetitive DBR. Only 35 points were marked similarly by 8 users; in other words, 8 users totally agreed with 4% of the caries points. According to 50 repetitive DBR, the maximum accuracy of users was 69% and the minimum was 50%. Conclusions: There is significant debate over the diagnosis of caries on DBR; therefore, for unifying the radiologist’s opinions, the need for intelligent caries detection software is apparent. DCMS is useful software for gathering caries data. Moreover, the use of conventional display monitor has negative impacts on accurate diagnosis of caries on DBR.

Authors and Affiliations

H Baseri, R Rafeh, F Soltani Tafreshi, M Houshyar, L Khojastepour

Keywords

Related Articles

Gingival Retraction Methods for Fabrication of Fixed Partial Denture: Literature Review

Fixed dental prosthesis success requires appropriate impression taking of the prepared finish line. This is critical in either tooth supported fixed prosthesis (crown and bridge) or implant supported fixed prosthesis (so...

Evaluation of Perceived Acceptability, Beauty and Value of Different Orthodontic Brackets

Statement of Problem: Although different types of aesthetic brackets are introduced to orthodontic profession to reduce the complaints about the metallic braces, little studies have been done to assess patient's views re...

Dimensional Stability of Color-Changing Irreversible Hydrocolloids after Disinfection

Statement of Problem: Disinfection of dental impressions is a weak point in the dental hygiene chain. In addition, dental office personnel and dental technicians are endangered by cross-contamination. Objectives: This st...

Comparing the Accuracy of Silicone and Polyether in Reproducing Gingival Height for Implant Supported Crown: an in vitro study

Statement of Problem: Accurate impressions are one of the most critical factors in achieving acceptable restorations. When pouring the impressions of implant supported restorations, soft materials like silicone and polye...

Comparison of Bone Biomechanical Behavior around Three Different Mini-Implant Systems Employing Finite Element Method

Statement of Problem: Placement of mini-dental implants when single-tooth restorations are needed and the space is not sufficient to insert a standard diameter implant is indicated. There are many different mini-implant...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP248898
  • DOI -
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

H Baseri, R Rafeh, F Soltani Tafreshi, M Houshyar, L Khojastepour (2015). Introducing a Dental Caries Marking Software and Evaluate Radiologists’ Disagreement in Caries Detection Using this Software. Journal of Dental Biomaterials, 2(1), 10-17. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-248898