Is secrecy a barrier for intelligence studies?

Journal Title: ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies - Year 2013, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

This articles aims to highlight the issues, challenges and constraints of intelligence studies considering the notion of cryptic space, understood as a “secret space of communication within which the individual is exempt from the requirements and constraints of secrecy “(Bulinge, 2002). This article aims to highlight two ways for social research in the field of intelligence. In particular, we will show that the multiple dimensions of information can be addressed by researchers without prejudice to the constraints related to the preservation of secrecy. In other words, secrecy as a part of intelligence is not a barrier for intelligence studies.

Authors and Affiliations

Franck BULINGE| Professeur en Management de l’Information et de la Communication, I3M, Institut supérieur du commerce de Paris, FRANCEThis articles aims to highlight the issues, challenges and constraints of intelligence studies considering the notion of cryptic space, understood as a “secret space of communication within which the individual is exempt from the requirements and constraints of secrecy “(Bulinge, 2002). This article aims to highlight two ways for social research in the field of intelligence. In particular, we will show that the multiple dimensions of information can be addressed by researchers without prejudice to the constraints related to the preservation of

Keywords

Related Articles

Transnational communication and domestic environmental policy learning

This article seeks to provide patterns of how transnational communication may lead to domestic policy learning. Existing theories of policy learning, policy diffusion and policy convergence assume that transnational co...

Between Mediation and Mediatisation: Identity Dynamics at Play in Online Self-Publishing [Self-Broadcasting] Systems

Based on research conducted in Belgium for ten years on the identity dynamics within online self-publishing, selfbroadcasting systems, this paper examines the extent to which the ongoing age of self-publishing foll...

Memory transition between communicating agents

What happens to a memory when it has been externalised and embodied but has not reached its addressee yet? A letter that has been written but has not been read, a monument before it is unveiled or a Neolithic tool buri...

The case of glasses-cameras. Studying audiovisual experimental devices: what are the contribution and the limit, and what is at stake?

Our research project deals with uses of the new kinds of mobile terminals - phones, tablets, e-books and various digital processes - and intends to analyze them according to a specific approach, that has to do with inf...

Christian Metz and the mediatization

This paper makes reference to a series of controversial aspects which were awakened by Christian Metz’s work over the course of his active life and are still in the spotlight thirty five years after his demise. The p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP9143
  • DOI -
  • Views 337
  • Downloads 22

How To Cite

Franck BULINGE (2013). Is secrecy a barrier for intelligence studies?. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, 6(2), 113-125. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-9143