Locked Compression Plating Versus Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing In The Management Of Diaphyseal Humerus Fracture - Randomized Control Trail

Abstract

With the recognition of the role of vascularity and soft tissue in fracture healing, Locking Compression Plates were developed. LCP leave minimal footprints on the surface of bone in comparison to conventional plates. The use of Intramedullary locking nails has recently gained momentum after their dramatic success in fixation of lower limb fractures. There are very few studies comparing these two newer methods of fixation. This prospective, randomized study compares these two fixation methods. 57 patients in IMN group were compared with 51 patients in LCP group. Both groups were comparable in term of age, gender, duration of injury, site and comminution at fracture site. Patients were evaluated for intraoperative blood loss, surgery time, radiation exposure, post-operative radial nerve palsy, duration of post operative stay, infection rate, reoperation rate and union time during follow up. At each follow up, sign of union were assessed. Functional evaluation was done at 1 year with ASES and RM score. IMN group showed significantly better results in term of intra-operative blood loss and less post operative hospital stay. The less operative time and an earlier tendency towards union were also seen in IMN group although not statistically significant. Fewer complications in term of infection and radial nerve palsy in IMN group seen. The final union rates were same in both groups. Although shoulder stiffness remained a concern in nailing group, functional evaluation at 1 year showed nailing to be superior to plate fixation group. With the use of LCP reoperation rate was also comparable in both groups. With more and more patients demanding for minimally invasive surgeries, nailing can be a preferred method for fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus.

Authors and Affiliations

SPS Gill, ankit mittal, sunil kumar, Manish Raj, Pulkesh Singh, javed Ali

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative Study Of Tourniquet V/S Tranexamic Acid Use On Blood Loss In Total Knee Arthroplasty

Context: Total knee replacement (TKR) is often carried out using a tourniquet to minimize intraoperative blood loss. However, its application enhances local fibrinolysis, resulting in excessive blood loss during the post...

Clinical Evaluation Of Plantar Fascitis Treated With Prp Vs Corticosteroid Injection

Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common cause of heel pain. It is thought to result from chronic overload and is characterized by pain at the calcaneal origin of the plantar fascia, exacerbated by weight bearing af...

Proximal Femoral Nailing Vs Dynamic Hip Screw For Intertrochanteric Fractures – A Comparative Clinical Study

Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the common fractures encountered in today's orthopaedic practice. Over time, a number of implants have been used for the same. Multiple studies have been conducted in the past to st...

Study Of Effect Of Zoledronic Acid In Patients With Low Back Pain Associated With Vertebral Osteoporosis

Low back pain is the third most common orthopaedic problem. Most of the times it is overlooked and underdiagnosed and consequently undertreated. Vertebral osteoporosis is a common cause of low back pain and its early det...

Study Of Functional Outcome With Common Forms Of Internal Fixation For Patellar Fractures

To assess the functional outcome of common surgical procedures (Figure of 8 tension band wiring, Cerclage wiring, Interfragmentary screw, Combined Tension band with Cerclage wiring) for treatment of fracture patella.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP393563
  • DOI -
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

SPS Gill, ankit mittal, sunil kumar, Manish Raj, Pulkesh Singh, javed Ali (2016). Locked Compression Plating Versus Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing In The Management Of Diaphyseal Humerus Fracture - Randomized Control Trail. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 2(1), 14-23. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-393563