LOGICAL (MENTAL) PART OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF TRUTH IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT PROCESS
Journal Title: Юридичний бюлетень - Year 2018, Vol 8, Issue
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the philosophical and legal dimensions of the logic of assessment of evidence in the constitutional court process of its influence on the adoption of a fair and well-founded judicial decision. Particular attention is paid to the definition of the general principles and differences of the philosophical and functional specificity of the logic of assessing evidence in the work of the body of constitutional jurisdiction in protecting the rights and fundamental freedoms of man and citizen. According to the results of the research, the author makes some conclusions, which are as follows: – in jurisprudence, “logic” is used freely and refers to a fund of beliefs or generalizations, as well as types of reasoning that judges or lawyers use in defining as “common sense”; – although the process of evaluating evidence is not purely scientific, in the context of the fact that it does not aim to know the laws of the physical and social conditions of their occurrence, however, the cognitive mental activity of the subject of evidence to identify or confirm the facts, circumstances or phenomena of reality, de facto carried out with the use of dialectical and formal logic and other categories of science philosophy of law; – the main task of assessing evidence in a constitutional court proceeding is to resolve issues of compliance or non-compliance of certain normative acts, both in terms of content and procedure of their consideration and approval, with the requirements of the Constitution (constitutionality or unconstitutionality). That is, the classical assessment of the true values of evidence, which, as noted, consists in the fact that the main interpretation is considered as attributing to each proof one of two values – “true” or “false”; – the CCU judge has the opportunity to legally express his understanding of the logic of forming both the legal (legal) position and the provisions of the final act of the Court on issues that were considered, first, by voting, and secondly, in separate opinions, which are set out in writing.
Authors and Affiliations
Наталя Костянтинівна Шаптала
DEFINING PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL LAW OF UKRAINE
The article is devoted to the review and analysis of different types and peculiar features of the principles of Medical Law in Ukraine and Germany. It is emphasized that the review of Medical Law principles is essential...
SYSTEM OF SPECIALLY AUTHORIZED SUBJECTS FOR CORRUPTION PREVENTION: MODERN STATE AND COURSES OF FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
The article analyzes the current state and defined directions of further development of the system of specially authorized persons to counteract corruption in Ukraine. It is stressed that the prevention and counteraction...
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PHYSICAL TRAINING OF THE PERMANENT AND NON-PERMANENT PERSONNEL OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS OF THE MIA OF UKRAINE AS A TECHNOLOGY OF STATE CONTROL OVER THEIR PHYSICAL TRAINING AND HEALTH
In the article on the basis of analysis of socio-economic factors of public-political life of the Ukrainian state in modern terms, taking into account actual occupation by the nearby country-aggressor of some territories...
SPECIFICS OF THE NON-JURISDICTIONAL FORM OF COSTUMERS’ RIGHTS PROTECTION UNDER THE TREATY ON PROVISION OF SERVICES
In the article it was carried out the characteristic of the non-jurisdictional form of protection and the possibilities of its application in the legal relations that come out from the treaty on the provision of services...
ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNAL SERVICES: SHORT STORIES OF LEGISLATION AND ASPECTS OF IMPROVEMENT
The article is devoted to housing and communal services as an object of administrative and legal regulation. Recently, the housing and utilities industry has been at the center of public attention due to the changes taki...